mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: firmware: new "platform microcode" warning in v3.13-rc1+
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:32:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hr492cob2.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVM-KeJWXL9_H0Af=p+G=Dq5DhY9VEVuGnMiU_pZcS6BjA@mail.gmail.com>

At Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:15:09 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> > 0) Booting v3.13-rc1 and v3.13-rc2 triggers two new warnings on an
> > (outdated, I'm afraid) ThinkPad X41:
> >     [...]
> >     <6>[   16.746119] libipw: 802.11 data/management/control stack, git-1.1.13
> >     <6>[   16.746125] libipw: Copyright (C) 2004-2005 Intel Corporation <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
> >     <4>[   16.761998] platform microcode: Direct firmware load failed with error -2
> >     <4>[   16.762022] platform microcode: Falling back to user helper
> >     <6>[   16.787885] ipw2200: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200/2915 Network Driver, 1.2.2kmprq
> >     <6>[   16.787895] ipw2200: Copyright(c) 2003-2006 Intel Corporation
> >     <6>[   16.788741] ipw2200: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG Network Connection
> >     [...]
> >
> > (I've added the surrounding lines because they suggest this is about the
> > firmware for that wireless device. Please note that this device appears
> > to work no worse than it did under v3.12.)
> >
> > 1) These warnings can be traced back to commit 3e358ac2bb5b ("firmware:
> > Be a bit more verbose about direct firmware loading failure").
> 
> Yes, the warning was introduced in the commit since Neil thought it
> is needed.

The current behavior isn't much useful as is, unfortunately.  It just
warns that the firmware loading failed, but it doesn't tell you
*which* firmware failed.

> > 2) Is there something I'm supposed to do to silence these warnings? If
> > so, what would that be? If not, can these messages perhaps be downgraded
> > to dev_info or dev_notice?
> 
> Currently the messages are dumped via dev_warn(), and it is a bit difficult
> to make policy about the warning: sounds like Neil need them, and you
> don't like them, :-)

IMO, dev_warning() is too much in a case like Intel wifi driver.  It
retries with different firmware revision when the latest firmware
doesn't exist, so the missing firmware isn't always a problem.


Takashi

      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-24 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-01 17:32 Paul Bolle
2013-12-24  1:15 ` Ming Lei
2013-12-24 14:32   ` Takashi Iwai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hr492cob2.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®