From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
patches@x86-64.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/4] x86_64: Fail dma_alloc_coherent on dma less devices
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:46:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hy7g6mtbl.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708182103.25461.ak@suse.de>
At Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:03:25 +0200,
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Considering that the oops comes from this:
> >
> > /* Kludge to make it bug-to-bug compatible with i386. i386
> > uses the normal dma_mask for alloc_coherent. */
> > dma_mask &= *dev->dma_mask;
>
> >
> > and that that code is *old*, and comes from when this file was called
> > arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c, and the comment doesn't seem to even be
>
> It might be outdated or it might now. The kludge was needed for Alsa because old
> i386 ignored the consistent mask and they didn't always set it correctly, but that
> should be obsolete now? I'm not quite sure because sound devices
> are not always well tested on large memory systems which are the only
> ones who show this problem. Takashi, do you know if all alsa drivers
> set consistent mask correctly now?
Yes, ALSA driver set both masks from the very beginning :)
There are some OSS drivers still calling only pci_set_dma_mask().
Through a quick look, maybe only trident.c needs a fix because it uses
a mask < 32bit for ALI devices. Others use 32bit DMA mask.
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-15 0:40 [PATCH] [0/4] More late merge bug fixes for 2.6.23 Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 0:40 ` [PATCH] [1/4] x86_64: Fail dma_alloc_coherent on dma less devices Andi Kleen
2007-08-18 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-18 19:03 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 9:46 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2007-08-15 0:40 ` [PATCH] [2/4] x86_64: Fix to keep watchdog disabled by default for i386/x86_64 Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 0:40 ` [PATCH] [3/4] x86_64: Change PMDS invocation to single macro Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 12:29 ` Clemens Koller
2007-08-15 13:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 0:40 ` [PATCH] [4/4] x86_64: Check for .cfi_rel_offset in CFI probe Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hy7g6mtbl.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@x86-64.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®