[Bug #22472] vga_switcheroo fails to switch from intel to ati

[Bug #22472] vga_switcheroo fails to switch from intel to ati

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
Subject		: vga_switcheroo fails to switch from intel to ati
Submitter	: Radu Andries <admiral0@tuxfamily.org>
Date		: 2010-11-08 16:46 (52 days old)

[Bug #22672] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
References	: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
		  http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02235.html
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
		  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/

Re: [Bug #22672] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a

[Larry Finger]

On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
> Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
> Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Date		: 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
> References	: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
> 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
> 		  http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02235.html
> Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
> 		  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/

Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.

Larry

Re: [Bug #22672] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
> > Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Date		: 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
> > References	: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
> > 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
> > 		  http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02235.html
> > Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
> > 		  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
> 
> Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #22672] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
> > Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Date		: 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
> > References	: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
> > 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
> > 		  http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02235.html
> > Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
> > 		  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
> 
> Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.

Does reverting commit 448f53a "drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC
clocks" help?

Rafael

[Bug #22662] divide error in select_task_rq_fair()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22662
Subject		: divide error in select_task_rq_fair()
Submitter	: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@hp.com>
Date		: 2010-11-10 23:58 (50 days old)
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/13/176
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/13/181

[Bug #22642] 2.6.37-rc1: Disk takes 10 seconds to resume - MacBook2,1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22642
Subject		: 2.6.37-rc1: Disk takes 10 seconds to resume - MacBook2,1
Submitter	: Tobias <devnull@plzk.org>
Date		: 2010-11-10 19:33 (50 days old)

[Bug #22562] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22562
Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2010-11-02 22:32 (58 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/3df7169e73fc1d71a39cffeacc969f6840cdf52b
Message-ID	: <4CD09166.4060202@lwfinger.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128873713207906&w=2

Re: [Bug #22562] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e

[Larry Finger]

On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22562
> Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e
> Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Date		: 2010-11-02 22:32 (58 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/3df7169e73fc1d71a39cffeacc969f6840cdf52b
> Message-ID	: <4CD09166.4060202@lwfinger.net>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128873713207906&w=2

It is still in 2.6.37-rc8. I got some debugging tips from Alan Stern, but have
not had time to follow-up. I hope/need to make some progress before 2.6.37 is
released.

Re: [Bug #22562] Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22562
> > Subject		: Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 - logs spammed with "unable to enumerate USB port" - bisected to commit 3df7169e
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Date		: 2010-11-02 22:32 (58 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/3df7169e73fc1d71a39cffeacc969f6840cdf52b
> > Message-ID	: <4CD09166.4060202@lwfinger.net>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128873713207906&w=2
> 
> It is still in 2.6.37-rc8. I got some debugging tips from Alan Stern, but have
> not had time to follow-up. I hope/need to make some progress before 2.6.37 is
> released.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

[Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22542
Subject		: [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors
Submitter	: Paul Rolland <rol@witbe.net>
Date		: 2010-11-02 14:58 (58 days old)
Message-ID	: <20101102155813.09cb2c6e@tux.DEF.witbe.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128870991628970&w=2

Re: [Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Paul Rolland]

Hello,

I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer

as well as :

Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.

Regards,
Paul

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:06:58 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> report of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22542
> Subject		: [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors
> Submitter	: Paul Rolland <rol@witbe.net>
> Date		: 2010-11-02 14:58 (58 days old)
> Message-ID	: <20101102155813.09cb2c6e@tux.DEF.witbe.net>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128870991628970&w=2
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Paul Rolland                                E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA                          Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche                     Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense                    RIPE : PR12-RIPE

LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrolland
Skype    : rollandpaul

"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's
too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation 

Re: [Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, December 31, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
> Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> 
> as well as :
> 
> Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
> Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.

There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the Linus' tree
after 2.6.37-rc8.  Perhaps you can give them a try?

Rafael

Re: [Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Friday, December 31, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
> > Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> >
> > as well as :
> >
> > Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
> > Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
>
> There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the
> Linus' tree after 2.6.37-rc8.  Perhaps you can give them a try?

  if this is in any way related to various systems booting to a black
screen (as i described earlier), i built an absolutely up-to-date
kernel from the latest tree and that didn't solve the problem.  i'm
open to testing suggestions.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: [Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Paul Rolland]

Hello, 

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:52:48 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
>   if this is in any way related to various systems booting to a black
> screen (as i described earlier), i built an absolutely up-to-date
> kernel from the latest tree and that didn't solve the problem.  i'm
> open to testing suggestions.

Nope... machine is booting fine, screen is Ok, and in fact the machine
seems to be working perfectly... The only point is that I never saw these
in any kernel prior to 2.6.37-rc1, and them being labelled as "ERROR" made
me write a report.

Anyway, if some can tell me how to get this linus'tree, I'm ready to give
it a try Sunday afternoon.

Best,
Paul

-- 
Paul Rolland                                E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA                          Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche                     Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense                    RIPE : PR12-RIPE

LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrolland
Skype    : rollandpaul

"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's
too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation 

Re: [Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Paul Rolland]

Hello Rafael,

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:47:24 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> On Friday, December 31, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
> > Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR*
> > Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> > 
> > as well as :
> > 
> > Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR*
> > fixme: max PWM is zero. Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel:
> > [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
> 
> There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the Linus' tree
> after 2.6.37-rc8.  Perhaps you can give them a try?

OK, currently running : 
[root@tux ~]# uname -a
Linux tux.DEF.witbe.net 2.6.37-rc8-00014-g3643e0e #1 SMP Sun Jan 2 16:25:04 CET 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

and I've seen that too :
Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer

So, two possibilities :
 - 2.6.37-rc8-00014-g3643e0e is not what you wanted me to test,
 - the problem's still there.

Best,
Paul

-- 
Paul Rolland                                E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA                          Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche                     Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense                    RIPE : PR12-RIPE

LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrolland
Skype    : rollandpaul

"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's
too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation 

Re: [Bug #22542] [2.6.37-rc1] drm:i195 errors

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, January 03, 2011, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
> 
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:47:24 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, December 31, 2010, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I'm now running 2.6.37-rc8, and I still have :
> > > Dec 31 11:03:10 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR*
> > > Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> > > 
> > > as well as :
> > > 
> > > Dec 31 10:44:53 tux kernel: [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR*
> > > fixme: max PWM is zero. Dec 31 10:49:34 tux kernel:
> > > [drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.
> > 
> > There were some last-minute fixes related to i915 added to the Linus' tree
> > after 2.6.37-rc8.  Perhaps you can give them a try?
> 
> OK, currently running : 
> [root@tux ~]# uname -a
> Linux tux.DEF.witbe.net 2.6.37-rc8-00014-g3643e0e #1 SMP Sun Jan 2 16:25:04 CET 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> and I've seen that too :
> Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> Jan  3 08:27:30 tux kernel: [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt_ioctl] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer
> 
> So, two possibilities :
>  - 2.6.37-rc8-00014-g3643e0e is not what you wanted me to test,
>  - the problem's still there.

I think it's still there.  Thanks for testing!

Rafael

[Bug #23472] 2.6.37-rc2 vs. 2.6.36 laptop backlight changes?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23472
Subject		: 2.6.37-rc2 vs. 2.6.36 laptop backlight changes?
Submitter	: Patrick Schaaf <netdev@bof.de>
Date		: 2010-11-17 13:41 (43 days old)
Message-ID	: <1290001262.5727.2.camel@lat1>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129000127920912&w=2

[Bug #22882] (2.6.37-rc1) amd64-agp module crashed on second load

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22882
Subject		: (2.6.37-rc1) amd64-agp module crashed on second load
Submitter	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date		: 2010-11-05 0:13 (55 days old)
Message-ID	: <20101104171333.fea1f498.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128891605213447&w=2

[Bug #23102] [bisected] i915 regression in post 2.6.36 kernels

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23102
Subject		: [bisected] i915 regression in post 2.6.36 kernels
Submitter	: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Date		: 2010-11-10 7:02 (50 days old)
Message-ID	: <201011100802.20332.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128937310017057&w=2

[Bug #22912] spi_lm70llp module crash on unload (2.6.37-rc1)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22912
Subject		: spi_lm70llp module crash on unload (2.6.37-rc1)
Submitter	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date		: 2010-11-05 0:16 (55 days old)
Message-ID	: <20101104171620.00d8c95d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128891627913647&w=2

[Bug #22942] [2.6.37-rc1, OOM] virtblk: OOM in do_virtblk_request()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942
Subject		: [2.6.37-rc1, OOM] virtblk: OOM in do_virtblk_request()
Submitter	: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date		: 2010-11-05 1:30 (55 days old)
Message-ID	: <20101105013003.GE13830@dastard>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128892062917641&w=2

[Bug #22812] kernel oops on 2.6.37-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22812
Subject		: kernel oops on 2.6.37-rc1
Submitter	: Andrew <atswartz@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-11-12 16:05 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a68c439b1966c91f0ef474e2bf275d6792312726
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41192

[Bug #24372] kdump broken on 2.6.37-rc4

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24372
Subject		: kdump broken on 2.6.37-rc4
Submitter	: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Date		: 2010-12-03 11:16 (27 days old)
Message-ID	: <20101203111623.GA2741@redhat.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129137502323003&w=2

[Bug #24582] Kernel Oops at tty_buffer_request_room when using pppd program (2.6.37-rc4)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24582
Subject		: Kernel Oops at tty_buffer_request_room when using pppd program (2.6.37-rc4)
Submitter	: baoyb <baoyb@avit.org.cn>
Date		: 2010-12-08 13:55 (22 days old)
Message-ID	: <EF6DDE218DB34702B1FA84D6CD7EA771@baoyb>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129181763525738&w=2

[Bug #24272] iotop reports insane per-process disk read/write statistics

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24272
Subject		: iotop reports insane per-process disk read/write statistics
Submitter	: Brian Rogers <brian@xyzw.org>
Date		: 2010-12-03 12:00 (27 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/85893120699f8bae8caa12a8ee18ab5fceac978e

[Bug #23902] [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
Subject		: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
Submitter	: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date		: 2010-11-27 15:16 (33 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/305e6835e05513406fa12820e40e4a8ecb63743c
Message-ID	: <<19697.8378.717761.236202@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087098911837&w=2

Re: [Bug #23902] [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM

[Mikael Pettersson]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
> Subject		: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
> Submitter	: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Date		: 2010-11-27 15:16 (33 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/305e6835e05513406fa12820e40e4a8ecb63743c
> Message-ID	: <<19697.8378.717761.236202@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087098911837&w=2

Fixed in 2.6.37-rc7.

Re: [Bug #23902] [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
> > Subject		: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
> > Submitter	: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > Date		: 2010-11-27 15:16 (33 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/305e6835e05513406fa12820e40e4a8ecb63743c
> > Message-ID	: <<19697.8378.717761.236202@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087098911837&w=2
> 
> Fixed in 2.6.37-rc7.

Do you know which commit fixed it?

Rafael

[Bug #24362] perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24362
Subject		: perf hw  in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Submitter	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date		: 2010-12-01 8:00 (29 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/33c6d6a7ad0ffab9b1b15f8e4107a2af072a05a0
Message-ID	: <4CF60095.1020900@kernel.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129119055922065&w=2

[Bug #24822] Embedded DisplayPort is detected wrongly on HP ProBook 5320m

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24822
Subject		: Embedded DisplayPort is detected wrongly on HP ProBook 5320m
Submitter	: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date		: 2010-12-13 11:09 (17 days old)
Handled-By	: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

[Bug #25392] scsi_eh_11 CPU loop

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
Subject		: scsi_eh_11 CPU loop
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2010-08-18 6:18 (134 days old)
Message-ID	: <1282112318.21202.8.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?t=129283967100004&r=1&w=2
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/20/52

[Bug #25012] BUG: i915 causes NULL pointer dereference in 2.6.37-rc5-git4

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25012
Subject		: BUG: i915 causes NULL pointer dereference in 2.6.37-rc5-git4
Submitter	: Tõnu Raitviir <jussuf@linux.ee>
Date		: 2010-12-15 12:48 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/da79de97d254145dcb7c08c978b1093eac15ec9c
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012151238570.4797@jbbyvx.ohzcpyho.rr>
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg06282.html
Handled-By	: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41502

[Bug #24592] 2.6.37-rc5: NULL pointer oops in selinux_socket_unix_stream_connect

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24592
Subject		: 2.6.37-rc5: NULL pointer oops in selinux_socket_unix_stream_connect
Submitter	: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Date		: 2010-12-08 21:09 (22 days old)
Message-ID	: <4CFFF3F3.90100@goop.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129184256629712&w=2

[Bug #24882] PM/Hibernate: Memory corruption patch introduces regression (2.6.36.2)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
Subject		: PM/Hibernate: Memory corruption patch introduces regression (2.6.36.2)
Submitter	:  <akwatts@ymail.com>
Date		: 2010-12-14 04:00 (16 days old)

[Bug #24772] Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24772
Subject		: Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5
Submitter	: Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-12-10 20:30 (20 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTi=j9zsaYNcu=NgGV=HfE-3rNHzVswov8VrgwjQp@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129201308706568&w=2

Re: [Bug #24772] Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5

[Fabio Comolli]

Hi Rafael.
I don't have linux on that laptop anymore.

Regards,
Fabio

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24772
> Subject         : Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5
> Submitter       : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2010-12-10 20:30 (20 days old)
> Message-ID      : <AANLkTi=j9zsaYNcu=NgGV=HfE-3rNHzVswov8VrgwjQp@mail.gmail.com>
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129201308706568&w=2
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #24772] Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi Rafael.
> I don't have linux on that laptop anymore.

OK, so I'm closing the bug as unreproducible.

Thanks,
Rafael


> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24772
> > Subject         : Crash with btrfs rootfs on dm-crypt [ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806! ] on linux 2.6.37-rc5
> > Submitter       : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> > Date            : 2010-12-10 20:30 (20 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <AANLkTi=j9zsaYNcu=NgGV=HfE-3rNHzVswov8VrgwjQp@mail.gmail.com>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129201308706568&w=2
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

[Bug #24762] BUG at perf_ctx_adjust_freq (kernel/perf_event.c:1582)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24762
Subject		: BUG at perf_ctx_adjust_freq (kernel/perf_event.c:1582)
Submitter	: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date		: 2010-12-10 12:00 (20 days old)
Message-ID	: <c6d829$pqibha@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129198247531612&w=2

[Bug #25812] 2.6.37-rc7: Regression: b43: crashes in hwrng_register()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25812
Subject		: 2.6.37-rc7: Regression: b43: crashes in hwrng_register()
Submitter	: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@tu-ilmenau.de>
Date		: 2010-12-28 13:32 (2 days old)
Message-ID	: <slrnihjpnh.7t4.Mario.Holbe@darkside.dyn.samba-tng.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129354319002301&w=2

[Bug #25822] [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/truncate.c:479! on 2.6.37-rc8

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25822
Subject		: [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/truncate.c:479! on 2.6.37-rc8
Submitter	: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
Date		: 2010-12-29 6:58 (1 days old)
Message-ID	: <4D1AD935.1020504@oracle.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129360511222037&w=2

[Bug #25402] kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25402
Subject		: kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!
Submitter	: carlos <carlos.palma@ono.com>
Date		: 2010-12-21 19:58 (9 days old)

Re: [Bug #25402] kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!

[carlos palma]

I can confirm that this "regression" still exists with the kernel 
2.6.37-rc8.
The Call Trace is basically the same:

...
Kernel panic - not syncing: map_single ...
Pid 935, comm: NetworkManager Tainted
call trace
panic+oxbf/0x200
? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
?swiotlb_tlb_map_single+0x1ce/0x250
?map_single+0x46/0x60
swiotlb_map_page+0xa6/0xf
... and then the FREEZE ... only a hard reset brings to live (with 
2.6.36-2) Linux.

carlos.


On 12/30/2010 12:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	:http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25402
> Subject		: kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!
> Submitter	: carlos<carlos.palma@ono.com>
> Date		: 2010-12-21 19:58 (9 days old)
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #25402] kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, carlos palma wrote:
> I can confirm that this "regression" still exists with the kernel 
> 2.6.37-rc8.
> The Call Trace is basically the same:
> 
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: map_single ...
> Pid 935, comm: NetworkManager Tainted
> call trace
> panic+oxbf/0x200
> ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
> ?swiotlb_tlb_map_single+0x1ce/0x250
> ?map_single+0x46/0x60
> swiotlb_map_page+0xa6/0xf
> ... and then the FREEZE ... only a hard reset brings to live (with 
> 2.6.36-2) Linux.

Thanks for the info.

Why did you put "regression" into double quotes?

Rafael

Re: [Bug #25402] kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!

[carlos palma]

Because, at the beginning I tough it could be also a DELL firmware problem.
The 32 bit version works fine, the 64 bits under KVM works fine (tested 
with 1GB ram).
Only a few days ago I found similar problems also on DELL machines...
Happy new year

carlos


On 12/30/2010 11:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, carlos palma wrote:
>> I can confirm that this "regression" still exists with the kernel
>> 2.6.37-rc8.
>> The Call Trace is basically the same:
>>
>> ...
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: map_single ...
>> Pid 935, comm: NetworkManager Tainted
>> call trace
>> panic+oxbf/0x200
>> ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
>> ?swiotlb_tlb_map_single+0x1ce/0x250
>> ?map_single+0x46/0x60
>> swiotlb_map_page+0xa6/0xf
>> ... and then the FREEZE ... only a hard reset brings to live (with he begining
>> 2.6.36-2) Linux.
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Why did you put "regression" into double quotes?
>
> Rafael
>

Re: [Bug #25402] kernel (2.6.37-8-generic_amd64) panic on boot (with message "map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble) - possible regression !!!

[carlos palma]

Hi Rafael.
I've found the same bug reported in redhat 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668088).
carlos


On 12/30/2010 11:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, carlos palma wrote:
>> I can confirm that this "regression" still exists with the kernel
>> 2.6.37-rc8.
>> The Call Trace is basically the same:
>>
>> ...
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: map_single ...
>> Pid 935, comm: NetworkManager Tainted
>> call trace
>> panic+oxbf/0x200
>> ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
>> ?swiotlb_tlb_map_single+0x1ce/0x250
>> ?map_single+0x46/0x60
>> swiotlb_map_page+0xa6/0xf
>> ... and then the FREEZE ... only a hard reset brings to live (with
>> 2.6.36-2) Linux.
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Why did you put "regression" into double quotes?
>
> Rafael
>

[Bug #25432] Alpha fails to build with gcc 4.4

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25432
Subject		: Alpha fails to build with gcc 4.4
Submitter	: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date		: 2010-12-22 01:55 (8 days old)

[Bug #25602] [regression] 2.6.37-rc5: scsi_eh_11 CPU loop

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25602
Subject		: [regression] 2.6.37-rc5: scsi_eh_11 CPU loop
Submitter	: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date		: 2010-12-20 10:05 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <201012201105.08993.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129283954108331&w=2

[Bug #25422] nouveau fails to build on ia64

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25422
Subject		: nouveau fails to build on ia64
Submitter	: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date		: 2010-12-22 01:49 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41242

[Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
Subject		: ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
Submitter	: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date		: 2010-12-22 02:02 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41252

Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

[Krzysztof Halasa]

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:

> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
> Subject		: ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
incoming mail queue :-(
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
> > Subject		: ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
> 
> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
> incoming mail queue :-(

Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

[Krzysztof Halasa]

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:

>> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
>> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
>> incoming mail queue :-(
>
> Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.

s/is/isn't/ I assume.

I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any
regression here, AFAIK at least.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

[Ben Hutchings]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 665 bytes --]

On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:08 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> 
> >> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
> >> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
> >> incoming mail queue :-(
> >
> > Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
> 
> s/is/isn't/ I assume.
> 
> I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any
> regression here, AFAIK at least.

There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

[Krzysztof Halasa]

Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> writes:

> There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx.

Right. It seems I was reading what wasn't written.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

[Bug #25842] thinkpad T410s intel i915 regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25842
Subject		: thinkpad T410s intel i915 regression
Submitter	: Travis Hume <travis@computoring.org>
Date		: 2010-12-29 18:21 (1 days old)