* Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op?
@ 2002-10-10 0:07 Juan Gomez
2002-10-10 0:28 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juan Gomez @ 2002-10-10 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-kernel-owner, nfs
Oh ok. Well can we resuscitate this patch? The AFS NAS head example is a
good reason to do this.
If you need any help please let me know and I will be happy to test/adapt
the patch in/to the version that you may want to apply it.
We have one version for 2.4.18 that someone created recently if the one you
have is too old...
Thanks, Juan
|---------+---------------------------------->
| | Alan Cox |
| | <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.|
| | uk> |
| | Sent by: |
| | linux-kernel-owner@vger|
| | .kernel.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 10/09/02 04:32 PM |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Juan Gomez/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS |
| cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
| Subject: Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op? |
| |
| |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 00:11, Juan Gomez wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock
> requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side?
> I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but
such
> patch never got included in the distribution.
I know Matthew had the patches, and I know I looked at them and they
seemed sane enough. But I don't know where they eventually went. Things
like NFS over AFS are going to need it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op?
2002-10-10 0:07 Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op? Juan Gomez
@ 2002-10-10 0:28 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2002-10-10 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Gomez; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-kernel, linux-kernel-owner, nfs
>>>>> " " == Juan Gomez <juang@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Oh ok. Well can we resuscitate this patch? The AFS NAS head
> example is a good reason to do this. If you need any help
If you do, make sure that you get the latest patch from Brian and
*NOT* the one that was in earlier versions of the -ac tree. The
latter screws lockd quite royally...
Cheers,
Trond
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op?
2002-10-09 23:11 Juan Gomez
@ 2002-10-09 23:32 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-10-09 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Gomez; +Cc: nfs, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 00:11, Juan Gomez wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock
> requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side?
> I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but such
> patch never got included in the distribution.
I know Matthew had the patches, and I know I looked at them and they
seemed sane enough. But I don't know where they eventually went. Things
like NFS over AFS are going to need it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op?
@ 2002-10-09 23:11 Juan Gomez
2002-10-09 23:32 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juan Gomez @ 2002-10-09 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs; +Cc: linux-kernel
Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock
requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side?
I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but such
patch never got included in the distribution.
I think a patch to pass lock requests to the underlying filesystem does not
affect single node NFS servers and it enables us to
support clustered Linux-based NAS heads over distributed file systems.
Juan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-10 0:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-10 0:07 Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op? Juan Gomez
2002-10-10 0:28 ` Trond Myklebust
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-09 23:11 Juan Gomez
2002-10-09 23:32 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®