* 2.6.0-test11 brings out gettimeofday() non-monotonicity
@ 2003-12-04 20:54 Pasi Savolainen
2003-12-04 23:06 ` john stultz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pasi Savolainen @ 2003-12-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I (and several others) have had some problems on dual AMD platform with
time going backwards.
The 2.6.0-test11 -kernel seems to bring it forth very well. I can
trigger this behaviour _almost_ every time, simply by running 'updatedb'.
Result is that 'gettimeofday()' starts jumping backwards.
I used a program (from earlier gettimeofday() monotonicity discusion),
attached below.
- -
$ ./gtod-test | gawk '{ print $5; }' > avtime
# about 30sec here, then ^C
$ sort avtime | uniq -c
67
1 -
4 -1:999988
10 -1:999989
3 -1:999990
1 -1:999993
8 -1:999996
12 -1:999997
4 -1:999998
19611 -3:222832
1 -3:222833
- -
On the other hand I recently heard from a developer that monotonic_clock
gave in some cases values of about 0xffffffff00000756, which to me looks
like a botched 64bit math. This was happening on UP, AMD board.
I've looked at the i386/kernel/time.co/do_gettimeofday(), but don't find
any fault with it.
- gettimeofday.c -
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
int main( void )
{
int i = 0;
while( 1 )
{
struct timeval start;
struct timeval stop;
struct timeval diff;
int rc1;
int rc2;
if( i++ % 1000000 == 0 )
printf( "% 12d: Iterations so far\n", i );
rc1 = gettimeofday( &start, 0 );
rc2 = gettimeofday( &stop, 0 );
timersub( &stop, &start, &diff );
if( rc1 < 0 || rc2 < 0 )
printf( " %12d: rc1=%d rc2=%d. Failure!\n",
i,
rc1,
rc2
);
if( diff.tv_sec >= 0 && diff.tv_usec >= 0 )
continue;
printf( "% 12d: Time went backwards: %d:%06d\n",
i,
diff.tv_sec,
diff.tv_usec
);
}
}
- -
--
Psi -- <http://www.iki.fi/pasi.savolainen>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.0-test11 brings out gettimeofday() non-monotonicity
2003-12-04 20:54 2.6.0-test11 brings out gettimeofday() non-monotonicity Pasi Savolainen
@ 2003-12-04 23:06 ` john stultz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: john stultz @ 2003-12-04 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pasi Savolainen; +Cc: lkml
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:54, Pasi Savolainen wrote:
> I (and several others) have had some problems on dual AMD platform with
> time going backwards.
Hmmm. Just to double check, you're not running w/ the amd76x_pm module,
correct? That module has known issues regarding time.
> The 2.6.0-test11 -kernel seems to bring it forth very well. I can
> trigger this behaviour _almost_ every time, simply by running 'updatedb'.
Can you send any more info about the hardware? dmesg and .config as
well, please.
> On the other hand I recently heard from a developer that monotonic_clock
> gave in some cases values of about 0xffffffff00000756, which to me looks
> like a botched 64bit math. This was happening on UP, AMD board.
I'd very much like to hear more details about this one. What was the
test case, etc?
thanks
-john
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-04 23:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-04 20:54 2.6.0-test11 brings out gettimeofday() non-monotonicity Pasi Savolainen
2003-12-04 23:06 ` john stultz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®