[PATCH v2 0/3] docs: riscv: Some clarifies on hwprobe misaligned performance

[Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>]

This patchset clarifies some unclear things about hwprobe's misaligned
performance. Including:

- hwprobe misaligned performance is only applied to scalar from patch [1]
- The defined keys of RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* are values not bitmasks

I cherry-picked [1] rather than write dependency because the original patch
was submitted with lines wrapped to 80 characters. We can't directly apply
that patch using `git am` .

Changes in v2:
- Add fixes to the code in arch/riscv/and include/asm/hwprobe.h

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/tencent_9D721BDDF88C04DBB5151D57711D62524209@qq.com/

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJgzZorn5anPH8dVPqvjVWmLKqTi5bkLDR=FH-ZAcdXFnNe8Eg@mail.gmail.com/

Yangyu Chen (2):
  docs: riscv: hwprobe: Clarify misaligned keys are values not bitmasks
  RISC-V: hwprobe: not treat KEY_CPUPERF_0 as bitmask

enh (1):
  docs: riscv: Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs.

 Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h     |  1 -
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.1