mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove rq argument to the tracepoints
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 18:41:19 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-27a9da6538ee18046d7bff8e36a9f783542c54c3@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272997616.1642.207.camel@laptop>

Commit-ID:  27a9da6538ee18046d7bff8e36a9f783542c54c3
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/27a9da6538ee18046d7bff8e36a9f783542c54c3
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 4 May 2010 20:36:56 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:28:17 +0200

sched: Remove rq argument to the tracepoints

struct rq isn't visible outside of sched.o so its near useless to
expose the pointer, also there are no users of it, so remove it.

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1272997616.1642.207.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 include/trace/events/sched.h      |   32 ++++++++++----------------------
 kernel/sched.c                    |    8 ++++----
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c             |    3 +--
 kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c |    5 ++---
 kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c |    5 ++---
 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index cfceb0b..4f733ec 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -51,15 +51,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,
 
 /*
  * Tracepoint for waiting on task to unschedule:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- *        but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
  */
 TRACE_EVENT(sched_wait_task,
 
-	TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p),
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
 
-	TP_ARGS(rq, p),
+	TP_ARGS(p),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__array(	char,	comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)
@@ -79,15 +76,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_wait_task,
 
 /*
  * Tracepoint for waking up a task:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- *        but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
  */
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
 
-	TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success),
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
 
-	TP_ARGS(rq, p, success),
+	TP_ARGS(p, success),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__array(	char,	comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)
@@ -111,31 +105,25 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
 );
 
 DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success),
-	     TP_ARGS(rq, p, success));
+	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+	     TP_ARGS(p, success));
 
 /*
  * Tracepoint for waking up a new task:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- *        but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
  */
 DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success),
-	     TP_ARGS(rq, p, success));
+	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+	     TP_ARGS(p, success));
 
 /*
  * Tracepoint for task switches, performed by the scheduler:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- *        but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
  */
 TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
 
-	TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *prev,
 		 struct task_struct *next),
 
-	TP_ARGS(rq, prev, next),
+	TP_ARGS(prev, next),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__array(	char,	prev_comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 4956ed0..11ac0eb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state)
 		 * just go back and repeat.
 		 */
 		rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
-		trace_sched_wait_task(rq, p);
+		trace_sched_wait_task(p);
 		running = task_running(rq, p);
 		on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
 		ncsw = 0;
@@ -2439,7 +2439,7 @@ out_activate:
 	success = 1;
 
 out_running:
-	trace_sched_wakeup(rq, p, success);
+	trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
 	check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
 
 	p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2613,7 +2613,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
 
 	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
 	activate_task(rq, p, 0);
-	trace_sched_wakeup_new(rq, p, 1);
+	trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
 	check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
@@ -2833,7 +2833,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
 	struct mm_struct *mm, *oldmm;
 
 	prepare_task_switch(rq, prev, next);
-	trace_sched_switch(rq, prev, next);
+	trace_sched_switch(prev, next);
 	mm = next->mm;
 	oldmm = prev->active_mm;
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 2404b59..aa3a92b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -3212,8 +3212,7 @@ free:
 }
 
 static void
-ftrace_graph_probe_sched_switch(struct rq *__rq, struct task_struct *prev,
-				struct task_struct *next)
+ftrace_graph_probe_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
 {
 	unsigned long long timestamp;
 	int index;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index 5fca0f5..a55fccf 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ tracing_sched_switch_trace(struct trace_array *tr,
 }
 
 static void
-probe_sched_switch(struct rq *__rq, struct task_struct *prev,
-			struct task_struct *next)
+probe_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_array *tr,
 }
 
 static void
-probe_sched_wakeup(struct rq *__rq, struct task_struct *wakee, int success)
+probe_sched_wakeup(struct task_struct *wakee, int success)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
index 0271742..8052446 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ static void probe_wakeup_migrate_task(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
 }
 
 static void notrace
-probe_wakeup_sched_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
-	struct task_struct *next)
+probe_wakeup_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	cycle_t T0, T1, delta;
@@ -200,7 +199,7 @@ static void wakeup_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
 }
 
 static void
-probe_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success)
+probe_wakeup(struct task_struct *p, int success)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-07 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-04 12:38 [RFC PATCHSET] sched,perf: unify tracers in sched and move perf on top of TP Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched: drop @cpu argument from sched_in preempt notifier Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 17:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf: add perf_event_task_migrate() Tejun Heo
2010-05-05  5:08   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-05  5:16     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05  9:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05  9:37       ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05  9:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05  9:56           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf: add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out() Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 17:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04 17:22     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 17:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04 18:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-04 18:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04 18:32           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-05  4:48             ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05  9:58             ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-07 18:41           ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf: move perf_event_task_sched_in() next to fire_sched_notifiers_in() Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched: relocate fire_sched_notifiers_out() and trace_sched_switch() Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched: coalesce event notifiers Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched: add switch_in and tick tracepoints Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf: factor out perf_event_switch_clones() Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: make nr_events an int and add perf_online_mutex to protect it Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: prepare to move sched perf functions on top of tracepoints Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: " Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 17:29 ` [RFC PATCHSET] sched,perf: unify tracers in sched and move perf on top of TP Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05  5:00   ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05  9:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05  9:32       ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05  9:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05  9:54           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05 11:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05 12:28               ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05 16:55                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-05 18:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05 18:16                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05 18:30                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-06  6:28                         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-06  7:11                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-06  8:27                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-06  8:41                               ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-06  8:18                           ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-06  6:31                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-06  7:04                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-06  7:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-06  7:29                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-06  7:33                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05 12:33               ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-05 13:09                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-10  5:20             ` Paul Mackerras
2010-05-10  5:48               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-27a9da6538ee18046d7bff8e36a9f783542c54c3@git.kernel.org \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome