* [PATCH] i386: make kernel_execve() suitable for stack unwinding
@ 2010-09-02 13:01 Jan Beulich
2010-09-03 7:13 ` [tip:x86/asm] i386: Make " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2010-09-02 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, tglx, hpa; +Cc: arnd, linux-kernel
The explicit saving and restoring of %ebx was confusing stack unwind
data consumers, and it is plain unnecessary to do this within the
asm(), since that was only introduced for PIC user mode consumers of
the original _syscall3() macro this was derived from.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.36-rc3/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c
+++ 2.6.36-rc3-i386-unwind-annotations/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ int kernel_execve(const char *filename,
const char *const envp[])
{
long __res;
- asm volatile ("push %%ebx ; movl %2,%%ebx ; int $0x80 ; pop %%ebx"
+ asm volatile ("int $0x80"
: "=a" (__res)
- : "0" (__NR_execve), "ri" (filename), "c" (argv), "d" (envp) : "memory");
+ : "0" (__NR_execve), "b" (filename), "c" (argv), "d" (envp) : "memory");
return __res;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [tip:x86/asm] i386: Make kernel_execve() suitable for stack unwinding
2010-09-02 13:01 [PATCH] i386: make kernel_execve() suitable for stack unwinding Jan Beulich
@ 2010-09-03 7:13 ` tip-bot for Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Jan Beulich @ 2010-09-03 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, arnd, hpa, mingo, jbeulich, JBeulich, tglx, mingo
Commit-ID: 7fe977dab356fbd7e86aa10bf83891761107c57c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/7fe977dab356fbd7e86aa10bf83891761107c57c
Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:01:58 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:16:02 +0200
i386: Make kernel_execve() suitable for stack unwinding
The explicit saving and restoring of %ebx was confusing stack
unwind data consumers, and it is plain unnecessary to do this
within the asm(), since that was only introduced for PIC user
mode consumers of the original _syscall3() macro this was
derived from.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
LKML-Reference: <4C7FBC660200007800013F95@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c
index d5e0662..0b0cb5f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ int kernel_execve(const char *filename,
const char *const envp[])
{
long __res;
- asm volatile ("push %%ebx ; movl %2,%%ebx ; int $0x80 ; pop %%ebx"
+ asm volatile ("int $0x80"
: "=a" (__res)
- : "0" (__NR_execve), "ri" (filename), "c" (argv), "d" (envp) : "memory");
+ : "0" (__NR_execve), "b" (filename), "c" (argv), "d" (envp) : "memory");
return __res;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-03 7:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-02 13:01 [PATCH] i386: make kernel_execve() suitable for stack unwinding Jan Beulich
2010-09-03 7:13 ` [tip:x86/asm] i386: Make " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome