[PATCH V2] tick: fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()

[PATCH V2] tick: fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()

[Viresh Kumar]

One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My
guess :)). Fix it.

Also fix spelling mistake in 'Possible'.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
V1->V2: Fix spelling mistake of possible as well.

 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 20b2fe3..0fec634 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
 		 * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
 		 * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
 		 * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
-		 * when then will increment time, posibly causing
+		 * which then will increment time, possibly causing
 		 * the loop to trigger again and again.
 		 */
 		if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

[tip:timers/core] tick: Fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()

[tip-bot for Viresh Kumar]

Commit-ID:  cacb3c76c2012ade52124e8c6fdc5cb125625772
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/cacb3c76c2012ade52124e8c6fdc5cb125625772
Author:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:09:18 +0530
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:56:49 +0100

tick: Fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()

One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My
guess :)). Fix it.

Also fix spelling mistake in 'Possible'.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: skarafotis@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2b29ca4230c163e44179941d7c7a16c1474385c2.1395743878.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 20b2fe3..0fec634 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
 		 * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
 		 * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
 		 * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
-		 * when then will increment time, posibly causing
+		 * which then will increment time, possibly causing
 		 * the loop to trigger again and again.
 		 */
 		if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())