mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86/intel: Fix wrong lbr_sel_mask
@ 2016-04-21  9:30 kan.liang
  2016-04-28 10:25 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Fix incorrect lbr_sel_mask value tip-bot for Kan Liang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kan.liang @ 2016-04-21  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, tglx, linux-kernel; +Cc: ak, eranian, Kan Liang

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>

This patch fixes an issue which starts from 
'commit b16a5b52eb90 ("perf/x86: Add option to disable reading
branch flags/cycles")'. In this patch, lbr_sel_mask is used to mask
the lbr_select. But LBR_SEL_MASK doesn't include the bit for
LBR_CALL_STACK. So LBR call stack will never be set in lbr_select.

This patch corrects the LBR_SEL_MASK by including all valid bits in
LBR_SELECT. Also, the LBR_CALL_STACK bit is different as other bit in
LBR_SELECT. It does not operate in suppress mode, so it needs to be
specially handled in intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 317e29e..551d655 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static enum {
 
 #define LBR_PLM (LBR_KERNEL | LBR_USER)
 
-#define LBR_SEL_MASK	0x1ff	/* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
+#define LBR_SEL_MASK	0x3ff	/* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
 #define LBR_NOT_SUPP	-1	/* LBR filter not supported */
 #define LBR_IGN		0	/* ignored */
 
@@ -621,8 +621,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
 	 * The first 9 bits (LBR_SEL_MASK) in LBR_SELECT operate
 	 * in suppress mode. So LBR_SELECT should be set to
 	 * (~mask & LBR_SEL_MASK) | (mask & ~LBR_SEL_MASK)
+	 * But the 10th bit LBR_CALL_STACK does not operate
+	 * in suppress mode.
 	 */
-	reg->config = mask ^ x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask;
+	reg->config = mask ^ (x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask & ~LBR_CALL_STACK);
 
 	if ((br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES) &&
 	    (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS) &&
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Fix incorrect lbr_sel_mask value
  2016-04-21  9:30 [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86/intel: Fix wrong lbr_sel_mask kan.liang
@ 2016-04-28 10:25 ` tip-bot for Kan Liang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Kan Liang @ 2016-04-28 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: jolsa, linux-kernel, tglx, acme, alexander.shishkin, hpa,
	kan.liang, mingo, vincent.weaver, eranian, peterz

Commit-ID:  cf3beb7c90a8efa16a06b26634cddddc92bb819c
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/cf3beb7c90a8efa16a06b26634cddddc92bb819c
Author:     Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:30:10 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:32:43 +0200

perf/x86/intel: Fix incorrect lbr_sel_mask value

This patch fixes a bug which was introduced by:

 b16a5b52eb90 ("perf/x86: Add option to disable reading branch flags/cycles")

In this patch, lbr_sel_mask is used to mask the lbr_select. But LBR_SEL_MASK
doesn't include the bit for LBR_CALL_STACK. So LBR call stack will never be
set in lbr_select.

This patch corrects the LBR_SEL_MASK by including all valid bits in
LBR_SELECT. Also, the LBR_CALL_STACK bit is different as other bit in
LBR_SELECT. It does not operate in suppress mode, so it needs to be
specially handled in intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461231010-4399-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 6c3b7c1..1ca5d1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static enum {
 
 #define LBR_PLM (LBR_KERNEL | LBR_USER)
 
-#define LBR_SEL_MASK	0x1ff	/* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
+#define LBR_SEL_MASK	0x3ff	/* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
 #define LBR_NOT_SUPP	-1	/* LBR filter not supported */
 #define LBR_IGN		0	/* ignored */
 
@@ -610,8 +610,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
 	 * The first 9 bits (LBR_SEL_MASK) in LBR_SELECT operate
 	 * in suppress mode. So LBR_SELECT should be set to
 	 * (~mask & LBR_SEL_MASK) | (mask & ~LBR_SEL_MASK)
+	 * But the 10th bit LBR_CALL_STACK does not operate
+	 * in suppress mode.
 	 */
-	reg->config = mask ^ x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask;
+	reg->config = mask ^ (x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask & ~LBR_CALL_STACK);
 
 	if ((br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES) &&
 	    (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS) &&

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-28 10:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-21  9:30 [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86/intel: Fix wrong lbr_sel_mask kan.liang
2016-04-28 10:25 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Fix incorrect lbr_sel_mask value tip-bot for Kan Liang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome