* [PATCH] [v3] x86, syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()
@ 2017-10-18 17:21 Dave Hansen
2017-10-20 12:25 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2017-10-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Dave Hansen, luto, brgerst, x86
Changes from v2:
* Fixed UML compile error from not including syscall header
Changes from v1:
* Added cast to (unsigned int)
* Added comments
--
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
We do not have tracepoints for sys_modify_ldt() because we define
it directly instead of using the normal SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros.
However, there is a reason sys_modify_ldt() does not use the macros:
it has an 'int' return type instead of 'unsigned long'. This is
a bug, but it's a bug cemented in the ABI.
What does this mean? If we return -EINVAL from a function that
returns 'int', we have 0x00000000ffffffea in %rax. But, if we
return -EINVAL from a function returning 'unsigned long', we end
up with 0xffffffffffffffea in %rax, which is wrong.
To work around this and maintain the 'int' behavior while using
the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros, so we add a cast to 'unsigned int'
in both implementations of sys_modify_ldt().
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
---
b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h | 2 +-
b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt 2017-10-18 09:21:54.210460494 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h 2017-10-18 09:21:54.217460834 -0700
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long
asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int);
/* kernel/ldt.c */
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
+asmlinkage long sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
/* kernel/signal.c */
asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigreturn(void);
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt 2017-10-18 09:21:54.212460591 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c 2017-10-18 09:21:54.218460882 -0700
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ out:
return error;
}
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
- unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+ unsigned long , bytecount)
{
int ret = -ENOSYS;
@@ -313,5 +314,14 @@ asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func,
ret = write_ldt(ptr, bytecount, 0);
break;
}
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * The SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros give us an 'unsigned long'
+ * return type, but tht ABI for sys_modify_ldt() expects
+ * 'int'. This cast gives us an int-sized value in %rax
+ * for the return code. The 'unsigned' is necessary so
+ * the compiler does not try to sign-extend the negative
+ * return codes into the high half of the register when
+ * taking the value from int->long.
+ */
+ return (unsigned int)ret;
}
diff -puN arch/x86/um/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt arch/x86/um/ldt.c
--- a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt 2017-10-18 09:21:54.214460688 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c 2017-10-18 09:25:55.128131160 -0700
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <os.h>
@@ -369,7 +370,9 @@ void free_ldt(struct mm_context *mm)
mm->arch.ldt.entry_count = 0;
}
-int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr, unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+ unsigned long , bytecount)
{
- return do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
+ /* See non-um modify_ldt() for why we do this cast */
+ return (unsigned int)do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
}
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()
2017-10-18 17:21 [PATCH] [v3] x86, syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt() Dave Hansen
@ 2017-10-20 12:25 ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2017-10-20 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: dave.hansen, mingo, torvalds, peterz, linux-kernel, brgerst,
luto, tglx, hpa
Commit-ID: da20ab35180780e4a6eadc804544f1fa967f3567
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/da20ab35180780e4a6eadc804544f1fa967f3567
Author: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:21:07 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:37:33 +0200
x86/entry: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()
We do not have tracepoints for sys_modify_ldt() because we define
it directly instead of using the normal SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros.
However, there is a reason sys_modify_ldt() does not use the macros:
it has an 'int' return type instead of 'unsigned long'. This is
a bug, but it's a bug cemented in the ABI.
What does this mean? If we return -EINVAL from a function that
returns 'int', we have 0x00000000ffffffea in %rax. But, if we
return -EINVAL from a function returning 'unsigned long', we end
up with 0xffffffffffffffea in %rax, which is wrong.
To work around this and maintain the 'int' behavior while using
the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros, so we add a cast to 'unsigned int'
in both implementations of sys_modify_ldt().
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018172107.1A79C532@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
arch/x86/um/ldt.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
index 91dfcaf..bad25bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long, unsigned long, int);
asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int);
/* kernel/ldt.c */
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
+asmlinkage long sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
/* kernel/signal.c */
asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigreturn(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
index f0e64db..0402d44 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ out:
return error;
}
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
- unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+ unsigned long , bytecount)
{
int ret = -ENOSYS;
@@ -313,5 +314,14 @@ asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
ret = write_ldt(ptr, bytecount, 0);
break;
}
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * The SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros give us an 'unsigned long'
+ * return type, but tht ABI for sys_modify_ldt() expects
+ * 'int'. This cast gives us an int-sized value in %rax
+ * for the return code. The 'unsigned' is necessary so
+ * the compiler does not try to sign-extend the negative
+ * return codes into the high half of the register when
+ * taking the value from int->long.
+ */
+ return (unsigned int)ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
index 836a1eb..3ee234b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <os.h>
@@ -369,7 +370,9 @@ void free_ldt(struct mm_context *mm)
mm->arch.ldt.entry_count = 0;
}
-int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr, unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+ unsigned long , bytecount)
{
- return do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
+ /* See non-um modify_ldt() for why we do this cast */
+ return (unsigned int)do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-20 12:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-18 17:21 [PATCH] [v3] x86, syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt() Dave Hansen
2017-10-20 12:25 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome