From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger 2.6.27-rc4 released
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:32:57 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tkrat.28e983dc4d04d109@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808221140.25029.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
On 22 Aug, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Friday 22 August 2008 00:09, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>> > On Thursday 21 August 2008 22:26, jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote:
>> >> It's simple to reproduce. Take away the volatile declaration for the
>> >> rlock_t structure in mdb-ia32.c (rlock_t debug_lock) in all code
>> >> references and watch the thing lock up in SMP with multiple processors
>> >> in the debugger each stuck with their own local copy of debug_lock.
>> >
>> > You should disable preempt before getting the processor id. Can't see any
>> > other possible bugs, but you should be able to see from the disassembly
>> > pretty easily.
>>
>> debug_lock() is AFAICS only called from contexts which have preemption
>> disabled. Last time around I recommended to Jeff to document this
>> requirement on the calling context.
>
> I'm not talking about where debug_lock gets called, I'm talking about
> where the processor id is derived that eventually filters down to
> debug_lock.
You are right, I replied to fast. debug_unlock() retrieves the
processor itself, but not debug_lock().
>> But even though preemption is disabled, debug_lock() is still incorrect
>> as I mentioned in my other post a minute ago. It corrupts its .flags
>> and .count members. (Or maybe it coincidentally doesn't as long as
>> volatile is around.)
>
> I don't think so. And flags should only be restored by the processor
> that saved it because the spinlock should disable preemption, right?
OK; the .count seems alright due to restrictions of the calling
contexts. About .flags: Jeff, can the following happen?
- Context A on CPU A has interrupts enabled. Enters debug_lock(),
thus disables its interrupts. (Saves its flags in rlock->flags with
the plan to enable interrupts later when leaving debug_unlock()
provided it does so as last holder.)
- Context B on CPU B happens to have interrupts disabled. Enters
debug_lock(), overwrites rlock->flags with its different value.
(Spins on the rlock which is held by CPU A.)
- Context A on CPU A leaves debug_unlock. Doesn't re-enable its
interrupts as planned, since rlock->flags is the one from CPU B.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-22 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-21 2:50 jmerkey
2008-08-21 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 10:57 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 11:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 14:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 14:58 ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 12:05 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 12:26 ` jmerkey
[not found] ` <43593.166.70.238.46.1219321595.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com >
2008-08-21 12:35 ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 13:37 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 14:09 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-22 1:40 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-22 6:32 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-08-22 11:54 ` jmerkey
2008-08-22 12:36 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 14:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 14:14 ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 16:21 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-21 21:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-21 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-24 4:25 ` jmerkey
2008-08-26 8:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 1:49 ` jmerkey
2008-08-22 1:37 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 14:02 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 14:08 ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 15:22 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 15:02 ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 15:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-24 0:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tkrat.28e983dc4d04d109@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®