mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger  2.6.27-rc4 released
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:32:57 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tkrat.28e983dc4d04d109@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808221140.25029.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>

On 22 Aug, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Friday 22 August 2008 00:09, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>> > On Thursday 21 August 2008 22:26, jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote:
>> >> It's simple to reproduce.  Take away the volatile declaration for the
>> >> rlock_t structure in mdb-ia32.c (rlock_t debug_lock) in all code
>> >> references and watch the thing lock up in SMP with multiple processors
>> >> in the debugger each stuck with their own local copy of debug_lock.
>> >
>> > You should disable preempt before getting the processor id. Can't see any
>> > other possible bugs, but you should be able to see from the disassembly
>> > pretty easily.
>>
>> debug_lock() is AFAICS only called from contexts which have preemption
>> disabled.  Last time around I recommended to Jeff to document this
>> requirement on the calling context.
> 
> I'm not talking about where debug_lock gets called, I'm talking about
> where the processor id is derived that eventually filters down to
> debug_lock.

You are right, I replied to fast.  debug_unlock() retrieves the
processor itself, but not debug_lock().

>> But even though preemption is disabled, debug_lock() is still incorrect
>> as I mentioned in my other post a minute ago.  It corrupts its .flags
>> and .count members.  (Or maybe it coincidentally doesn't as long as
>> volatile is around.)
> 
> I don't think so. And flags should only be restored by the processor
> that saved it because the spinlock should disable preemption, right?

OK; the .count seems alright due to restrictions of the calling
contexts.  About .flags:  Jeff, can the following happen?

  - Context A on CPU A has interrupts enabled.  Enters debug_lock(),
    thus disables its interrupts.  (Saves its flags in rlock->flags with
    the plan to enable interrupts later when leaving debug_unlock()
    provided it does so as last holder.)

  - Context B on CPU B happens to have interrupts disabled.  Enters
    debug_lock(), overwrites rlock->flags with its different value.
    (Spins on the rlock which is held by CPU A.)

  - Context A on CPU A leaves debug_unlock.  Doesn't re-enable its
    interrupts as planned, since rlock->flags is the one from CPU B.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/



  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-22  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21  2:50 jmerkey
2008-08-21 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 10:57   ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 11:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 11:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 12:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 14:53           ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 14:58             ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 12:05         ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 12:26           ` jmerkey
     [not found]             ` <43593.166.70.238.46.1219321595.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com >
2008-08-21 12:35               ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 13:37             ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 14:09               ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-22  1:40                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-22  6:32                   ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-08-22 11:54                     ` jmerkey
2008-08-22 12:36                       ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 14:09               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 14:30                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 14:14                   ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 14:48                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 16:21                 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-21 21:06               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-21 21:18                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:21                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-24  4:25                   ` jmerkey
2008-08-26  8:26                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27  1:49                       ` jmerkey
2008-08-22  1:37                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 14:02             ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 14:08               ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 15:22                 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 15:02                   ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 15:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 16:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 16:48             ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-24  0:01               ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 16:43           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tkrat.28e983dc4d04d109@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®