From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.org>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: gotom@debian.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:03:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w534rmynn77.wl@megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: In your message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:10:24 -0800 (PST)" <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112100908440.14166-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <w53d71n1c6g.wl@megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112100908440.14166-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
At Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:10:24 -0800 (PST),
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > >
> > > "generic_direct_IO()" should just get the device from "bh->b_dev (which is
> > > filled in correctly by "get_block()".
> >
> > Oh, that's right, the patch becomes more simple (and works well).
> > Is this patch OK?
Linus, Andrea, thank you for your comments!
> This looks fine to me. At some point we _may_ end up with filesystems that
> understand about multiple devices, so it's possible in theory that
> "get_block()" might return different devices for different blocks, but
> that does not happen currently, and I'm not really sure it ever will.
I don't test for the multiple device with direct IO under current
kernel..., I keep it in mind.
> Marcelo, I do believe this should go into 2.4.x too..
Thanks Marcelo for including my patch :)
I, however, found another problem.
Accessing with inode size unit (== 4096 byte) is ok, but if I accessed
with block size unit, generic_direct_IO() returns error. The reason
is that blocksize is designated as inode->i_blkbits, and its value is
not disk minimal block size (512), but inode's unit size (4096).
Patch is here. If inode is S_ISBLK and is not mounted, then blocksize
is set as hardsect_size. This implementation needs some computational
cost, but I think it can be ignored. This patch works well for me.
--- linux-2.4.17-pre8.vanilla/mm/filemap.c Tue Dec 11 15:54:57 2001
+++ linux-2.4.17-pre8/mm/filemap.c Tue Dec 11 16:21:40 2001
@@ -1508,8 +1508,22 @@
new_iobuf = 1;
}
- blocksize = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;
- blocksize_bits = inode->i_blkbits;
+ /*
+ * If inode is BLK and it is not already mounted,
+ * blocksize change hardsect_size.
+ */
+ if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) && !is_mounted(inode->i_rdev)) {
+ int size;
+
+ size = get_hardsect_size(inode->i_rdev);
+ blocksize = size;
+ for (blocksize_bits = 0; !(size & 1); )
+ size >>= 1, blocksize_bits++;
+ } else {
+ blocksize = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;
+ blocksize_bits = inode->i_blkbits;
+ }
+
blocksize_mask = blocksize - 1;
chunk_size = KIO_MAX_ATOMIC_IO << 10;
The current problem is that is_mounted() checking is worked for
/dev/sda1 (partition area) only, not for /dev/sda (total disk area),
if /dev/sda1 is mounted. This problem is also existed in /dev/raw
interface, but I think it's not important issue (should I fix it?)
Thanks,
-- gotom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-11 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <w53bsh9ybtn.wl@megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp>
2001-12-10 3:59 ` GOTO Masanori
2001-12-10 5:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-10 12:39 ` GOTO Masanori
2001-12-10 14:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-12-10 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-11 9:03 ` GOTO Masanori [this message]
2001-12-11 9:13 ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-11 11:30 ` GOTO Masanori
2001-12-11 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-11 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-11 18:03 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-12-12 0:25 ` Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-12-12 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-12 0:51 ` Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-12-12 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-12 3:25 ` GOTO Masanori
2001-12-12 16:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-12-12 2:46 ` Tachino Nobuhiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=w534rmynn77.wl@megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp \
--to=gotom@debian.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome