From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
michael.kerrisk@gmail.com, zach.brown@oracle.com, bcrl@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] man-pages: add documentation about the memlock implications of io_setup
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:44:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x494oy2ctpq.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c49095e30903090948n2d015516t480e917c36943001@mail.gmail.com> (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:48:07 +1300")
Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@googlemail.com> writes:
> [RESEND: Really CC+=Vegard Nossum, this time, and += mtk.manpages@, as well]
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Note that my address for man-pages is mtk.manpages@gmail.com.
Sorry about that!
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch, against man-pages-3.19, adds verbiage surrounding the newly
>> proposed accounting of pinned aio completion ring pages against the
>> memlock rlimit. It also fixes up a few references to aio_context_t
>> (which should be io_context_t). Sorry for conflating the two, I can
>> break it apart if needed.
>
> Breaking apart really would be better. Could you resubmit (to
> mtk.manpages@, and CC linux-man@vger) please?
Sure thing. I'll address your question when I resubmit.
Thanks!
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-09 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 15:49 [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 15:54 ` [patch] factor out checks against the memlock rlimit Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 15:59 ` [patch] man-pages: add documentation about the memlock implications of io_setup Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 16:45 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-03-09 16:48 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-03-09 20:44 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2009-03-09 16:18 ` [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 17:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 19:45 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 20:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-10 8:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 20:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 2:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 2:44 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12 3:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 3:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12 3:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 3:36 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12 3:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 3:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 5:18 ` [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 5:42 ` [PATCH] aio: " Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 5:47 ` [PATCH] fs: " Andrew Morton
2009-03-12 6:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 6:39 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-12 13:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-13 22:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-13 22:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-13 23:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-14 1:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-14 4:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-14 14:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-15 1:36 ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context Davide Libenzi
2009-03-15 17:44 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-15 20:08 ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (2nd rev) Davide Libenzi
2009-03-16 17:25 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-16 18:36 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 14:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 14:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 14:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-18 15:25 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 15:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-18 16:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 17:25 ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (3rd rev) Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 17:34 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-12 19:22 ` [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 20:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-09 22:36 ` [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Andrew Morton
2009-03-10 13:43 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x494oy2ctpq.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.kerrisk@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.kerrisk@googlemail.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®