From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl field
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:42:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49fv094lw6.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447143190-44589-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> (Hannes Reinecke's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:13:10 +0100")
Hi Hannes,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
> The current LOOP_SET_STATUS64 ioctl has two unused fields
> 'init[2]', which can be used in conjunction with the
> LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag to pass in the new logical blocksize.
I don't see a reason to set LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE inside of the
loop_device->lo_flags. It's not a flag that gets toggled; rather, it's a
flag that indicates that we're attempting to change the block size. The
block size is the persistent state. To further clarify, I'm okay with
passing it in info->lo_flags, I just don't like that it gets also set in
the struct loop_device. I also think that you should spell out
logical_block_size, instead of having physical_block_size and
block_size. It's just easier to read, in my opinion.
If you take my suggestion to set the physical block size automatically,
I think that will clean things up some, too. I'm looking forward to v2.
And just FYI, nothing looked horrible in patch 3/4, but I'm not going
to ack it until I see the v2 posting, since I think it will change at
least a little.
Cheers,
Jeff
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index d0b8754..6723e5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static void __loop_update_dio(struct loop_device *lo, bool dio)
> }
>
> static int
> -figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit)
> +figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit,
> + loff_t logical_blocksize)
> {
> loff_t size = get_size(offset, sizelimit, lo->lo_backing_file);
> sector_t x = (sector_t)size;
> @@ -234,6 +235,8 @@ figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit)
> if (lo->lo_sizelimit != sizelimit)
> lo->lo_sizelimit = sizelimit;
> if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE) {
> + if (lo->lo_logical_blocksize != logical_blocksize)
> + lo->lo_logical_blocksize = logical_blocksize;
> blk_queue_physical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, lo->lo_blocksize);
> blk_queue_logical_block_size(lo->lo_queue,
> lo->lo_logical_blocksize);
> @@ -1129,13 +1132,24 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - if (info->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE)
> + if (info->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE) {
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE;
> + if ((info->lo_init[0] != 512) &&
> + (info->lo_init[0] != 1024) &&
> + (info->lo_init[0] != 2048) &&
> + (info->lo_init[0] != 4096))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (info->lo_init[0] > lo->lo_blocksize)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
> lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit ||
> - lo->lo_flags != lo_flags)
> - if (figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit))
> + lo->lo_flags != lo_flags ||
> + ((lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE) &&
> + (lo->lo_logical_blocksize != info->lo_init[0])))
> + if (figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit,
> + info->lo_init[0]))
> return -EFBIG;
>
> loop_config_discard(lo);
> @@ -1320,7 +1334,8 @@ static int loop_set_capacity(struct loop_device *lo)
> if (unlikely(lo->lo_state != Lo_bound))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> - return figure_loop_size(lo, lo->lo_offset, lo->lo_sizelimit);
> + return figure_loop_size(lo, lo->lo_offset, lo->lo_sizelimit,
> + lo->lo_logical_blocksize);
> }
>
> static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 8:13 [PATCHv3 0/4] loop: enable different physical blocksizes Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-10 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-13 20:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-12-01 9:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-20 3:12 ` Ming Lei
2015-11-10 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] loop: Remove unused 'bdev' argument from loop_set_capacity Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-13 20:59 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-11-10 8:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] loop: Add 'lo_logical_blocksize' Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-10 8:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl field Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-13 21:42 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-31 19:37 [PATCHv3 0/4] loop: enable different physical blocksizes Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-31 19:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl field Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-01 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-01 16:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-03 13:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-08-07 8:54 [PATCHv2 0/4] loop: enable different physical blocksizes Hannes Reinecke
2015-08-07 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl field Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-17 7:27 [PATCH 0/4] loop: enable different physical blocksizes Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-17 7:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl field Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49fv094lw6.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®