From: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "Søren Sandmann Pedersen" <ssp@redhat.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack tracing routines
Date: 08 Nov 2010 12:38:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ye87hgorqoh.fsf@camel17.daimi.au.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101107212412.GB11134@nowhere>
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> writes:
> > (FWIW, this
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> > index 461a85d..d977d26 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> > @@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
> > .warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
> > .stack = backtrace_stack,
> > .address = backtrace_address,
> > - .walk_stack = print_context_stack_bp,
> > + .walk_stack = print_context_stack,
> > };
> >
> > makes it produce correct kernel callchains. And yes, I did compile the
> > kernel with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER).
>
>
>
> What do you see is broken in 64 bits perf callchains? Can you please provide
> me more details so that I can fix the issue?
Apparently, the problem only happens when using the hrtimer based
events. I don't think there is a way to make perf use those from the
command line, but if you apply this:
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ static void create_counter(int counter, int cpu)
attr->enable_on_exec = 1;
}
+ if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES && attr->type ==
PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
+ {
+ attr->type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
+ attr->config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
+ }
+
for (thread_index = 0; thread_index < thread_num; thread_index++) {
try_again:
fd[nr_cpu][counter][thread_index] = sys_perf_event_open(attr,
you should be able to see the problem. You can also try sysprof; it
always uses the software counters.
Soren
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ye8vdi7mluz.fsf@camel16.daimi.au.dk>
2009-10-22 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/2 -tip] perf: Don't generate events for the idle task when exclude_idle is set Soeren Sandmann
2009-10-22 16:38 ` [PATCH] x86: Get bp from the IRQ regs instead of directly from the CPU Soeren Sandmann
2009-10-23 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-29 12:46 ` Soeren Sandmann
2010-11-05 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/1] x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack tracing routines Søren Sandmann Pedersen
2010-11-07 21:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-08 11:38 ` Soeren Sandmann [this message]
2010-11-18 15:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-05 11:14 ` [PATCH] " Søren Sandmann Pedersen
2009-10-23 7:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf: Keep track of remaining time when enabling/disabling swevent hrtimers Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ye87hgorqoh.fsf@camel17.daimi.au.dk \
--to=sandmann@daimi.au.dk \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ssp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome