* [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
@ 2026-06-05 11:20 Hongjie Fang
2026-06-05 15:41 ` Bart Van Assche
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hongjie Fang @ 2026-06-05 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alim.akhtar, avri.altman, bvanassche, James.Bottomley,
martin.petersen, peter.wang, beanhuo
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel
A PM START STOP sent from the UFS well-known LU resume path can race with
SCSI EH.
The "wl resume" task flow is:
__ufshcd_wl_resume()
ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
ufshcd_execute_start_stop()
scsi_execute_cmd()
blk_execute_rq <-- wait
scsi_check_passthrough() <-- may retry START STOP
If the first START STOP time out, SCSI EH may already recover the link and
reset the device before scsi_execute_cmd() returns:
scsi_timeout()
scsi_eh_scmd_add()
scsi_error_handler()
scsi_unjam_host()
scsi_eh_ready_devs()
scsi_eh_host_reset()
ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler()
if (hba->pm_op_in_progress)
ufshcd_link_recovery()
ufshcd_device_reset()
ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore()
...
scsi_eh_flush_done_q() <-- wakeup "wl resume" task
... <-- host still in SHOST_RECOVERY
scsi_restart_operations()
A later passthrough retry can then run while the host is still in
SHOST_RECOVERY and hit the SCMD_FAIL_IF_RECOVERING path:
scsi_queue_rq()
if (scsi_host_in_recovery(shost) &&
cmd->flags & SCMD_FAIL_IF_RECOVERING)
return BLK_STS_OFFLINE
That retry completes with DID_ERROR or DID_NO_CONNECT even though EH may
already have restored the device to an operational ACTIVE state.
Handle these PM timeouts directly from ufshcd_eh_timed_out() instead.
After ufshcd_link_recovery(), complete the timed-out command immediately
if it has not been completed already.
For regular SCSI commands, complete them with DID_REQUEUE to match the
existing MCQ force-completion semantics and allow scsi_execute_cmd() to
retry if needed. For reserved internal device-management commands, finish
the request with DID_TIME_OUT without calling ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd()
since those commands use different resource lifetime rules.
The system_suspending flag is no longer needed because PM command timeout
handling now uses pm_op_in_progress.
Fixes: b8c3a7bac9b6 ("scsi: ufs: Have midlayer retry start stop errors")
Signed-off-by: Hongjie Fang <hongjiefang@asrmicro.com>
---
v5: complete SCSI commands with DID_REQUEUE and use DID_TIME_OUT for
reserved commands suggested by Peter Wang
v4: handle PM timeouts directly from ufshcd_eh_timed_out(), no longer
relay on the extra legacy single-doorbell force-completion path
v3: ufshcd_eh_timed_out() no longer checks the UFS device WLUN or the
START STOP opcode. It only checks whether a PM operation is in progress
for normal SCSI command
v2: handle PM SSU timeout directly from ufshcd_eh_timed_out() suggested
by Bart Van Assche
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index c3f08957d179..cc38588d99eb 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -9466,22 +9466,44 @@ static enum scsi_timeout_action ufshcd_eh_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
{
struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(scmd->device->host);
- if (!hba->system_suspending) {
+ if (!hba->pm_op_in_progress) {
/* Activate the error handler in the SCSI core. */
return SCSI_EH_NOT_HANDLED;
}
/*
- * If we get here we know that no TMFs are outstanding and also that
- * the only pending command is a START STOP UNIT command. Handle the
- * timeout of that command directly to prevent a deadlock between
+ * Handle the timeout directly to prevent a deadlock between
* ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode() and ufshcd_err_handler().
*/
ufshcd_link_recovery(hba);
dev_info(hba->dev, "%s() finished; outstanding_tasks = %#lx.\n",
__func__, hba->outstanding_tasks);
- return scsi_host_busy(hba->host) ? SCSI_EH_RESET_TIMER : SCSI_EH_DONE;
+ /*
+ * ufshcd_link_recovery() may already have completed @scmd, e.g. via
+ * the existing MCQ force-completion path.
+ */
+ if (!test_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &scmd->state)) {
+ if (!hba->mcq_enabled) {
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(scmd);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+ __clear_bit(rq->tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+ }
+
+ if (ufshcd_is_scsi_cmd(scmd)) {
+ set_host_byte(scmd, DID_REQUEUE);
+ ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, scmd);
+ } else {
+ set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
+ }
+
+ scsi_done(scmd);
+ }
+
+ return SCSI_EH_DONE;
}
static const struct attribute_group *ufshcd_driver_groups[] = {
@@ -10518,7 +10540,6 @@ static int ufshcd_wl_suspend(struct device *dev)
hba = shost_priv(sdev->host);
down(&hba->host_sem);
- hba->system_suspending = true;
if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
goto out;
@@ -10560,7 +10581,6 @@ static int ufshcd_wl_resume(struct device *dev)
hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode, hba->uic_link_state);
if (!ret)
hba->is_sys_suspended = false;
- hba->system_suspending = false;
up(&hba->host_sem);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
index cfbc75d8df83..8280a95c00c7 100644
--- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -1020,8 +1020,6 @@ enum ufshcd_mcq_opr {
* @caps: bitmask with information about UFS controller capabilities
* @devfreq: frequency scaling information owned by the devfreq core
* @clk_scaling: frequency scaling information owned by the UFS driver
- * @system_suspending: system suspend has been started and system resume has
- * not yet finished.
* @is_sys_suspended: UFS device has been suspended because of system suspend
* @urgent_bkops_lvl: keeps track of urgent bkops level for device
* @is_urgent_bkops_lvl_checked: keeps track if the urgent bkops level for
@@ -1197,7 +1195,6 @@ struct ufs_hba {
struct devfreq *devfreq;
struct ufs_clk_scaling clk_scaling;
- bool system_suspending;
bool is_sys_suspended;
enum bkops_status urgent_bkops_lvl;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
2026-06-05 11:20 [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH Hongjie Fang
@ 2026-06-05 15:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-06-08 8:51 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2026-06-05 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongjie Fang, alim.akhtar, avri.altman, James.Bottomley,
martin.petersen, peter.wang, beanhuo
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On 6/5/26 4:20 AM, Hongjie Fang wrote:
> A PM START STOP sent from the UFS well-known LU resume path can race with
> SCSI EH.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
2026-06-05 11:20 [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH Hongjie Fang
2026-06-05 15:41 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2026-06-08 8:51 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-06-08 21:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-06-16 2:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Wang (王信友) @ 2026-06-08 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: beanhuo, James.Bottomley, hongjiefang, alim.akhtar, avri.altman,
martin.petersen, bvanassche
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 19:20 +0800, Hongjie Fang wrote:
> A PM START STOP sent from the UFS well-known LU resume path can race
> with
> SCSI EH.
>
> The "wl resume" task flow is:
> __ufshcd_wl_resume()
> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
> ufshcd_execute_start_stop()
> scsi_execute_cmd()
> blk_execute_rq <-- wait
> scsi_check_passthrough() <-- may retry START STOP
>
> If the first START STOP time out, SCSI EH may already recover the
> link and
> reset the device before scsi_execute_cmd() returns:
> scsi_timeout()
> scsi_eh_scmd_add()
> scsi_error_handler()
> scsi_unjam_host()
> scsi_eh_ready_devs()
> scsi_eh_host_reset()
> ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler()
> if (hba->pm_op_in_progress)
> ufshcd_link_recovery()
> ufshcd_device_reset()
> ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore()
> ...
> scsi_eh_flush_done_q() <-- wakeup "wl resume" task
> ... <-- host still in SHOST_RECOVERY
> scsi_restart_operations()
>
> A later passthrough retry can then run while the host is still in
> SHOST_RECOVERY and hit the SCMD_FAIL_IF_RECOVERING path:
> scsi_queue_rq()
> if (scsi_host_in_recovery(shost) &&
> cmd->flags & SCMD_FAIL_IF_RECOVERING)
> return BLK_STS_OFFLINE
>
> That retry completes with DID_ERROR or DID_NO_CONNECT even though EH
> may
> already have restored the device to an operational ACTIVE state.
>
> Handle these PM timeouts directly from ufshcd_eh_timed_out() instead.
> After ufshcd_link_recovery(), complete the timed-out command
> immediately
> if it has not been completed already.
>
> For regular SCSI commands, complete them with DID_REQUEUE to match
> the
> existing MCQ force-completion semantics and allow scsi_execute_cmd()
> to
> retry if needed. For reserved internal device-management commands,
> finish
> the request with DID_TIME_OUT without calling
> ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd()
> since those commands use different resource lifetime rules.
>
> The system_suspending flag is no longer needed because PM command
> timeout
> handling now uses pm_op_in_progress.
>
> Fixes: b8c3a7bac9b6 ("scsi: ufs: Have midlayer retry start stop
> errors")
> Signed-off-by: Hongjie Fang <hongjiefang@asrmicro.com>
> ---
Thanks for fix this bug.
Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
2026-06-05 11:20 [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH Hongjie Fang
2026-06-05 15:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-06-08 8:51 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
@ 2026-06-08 21:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-06-16 2:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2026-06-08 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongjie Fang
Cc: alim.akhtar, avri.altman, bvanassche, James.Bottomley,
martin.petersen, peter.wang, beanhuo, linux-scsi, linux-kernel
Hongjie,
> A PM START STOP sent from the UFS well-known LU resume path can race
> with SCSI EH.
Applied to 7.2/scsi-staging, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
2026-06-05 11:20 [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH Hongjie Fang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-06-08 21:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2026-06-16 2:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2026-06-16 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alim.akhtar, bvanassche, James.Bottomley, peter.wang, beanhuo,
Avri Altman, Hongjie Fang
Cc: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 19:20:34 +0800, Hongjie Fang wrote:
> A PM START STOP sent from the UFS well-known LU resume path can race with
> SCSI EH.
>
> The "wl resume" task flow is:
> __ufshcd_wl_resume()
> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
> ufshcd_execute_start_stop()
> scsi_execute_cmd()
> blk_execute_rq <-- wait
> scsi_check_passthrough() <-- may retry START STOP
>
> [...]
Applied to 7.2/scsi-queue, thanks!
[1/1] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/01d5e237b339
--
Martin K. Petersen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-16 2:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-05 11:20 [PATCH v5] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH Hongjie Fang
2026-06-05 15:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-06-08 8:51 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-06-08 21:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-06-16 2:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®