From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
heiko@sntech.de, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, yue.wang@amlogic.com,
pali@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
jingoohan1@gmail.com, khilman@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Configure root port MPS to hardware maximum during host probing
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:56:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4963173-dd9a-4341-b7f9-5fdb9485233a@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAtikPOYlGeJCsiA@ryzen>
On 2025/4/25 18:23, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 05:57:07PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> Current PCIe initialization logic may leave root ports operating with
>> non-optimal Maximum Payload Size (MPS) settings. While downstream device
>> configuration is handled during bus enumeration, root port MPS values
>> inherited from firmware or hardware defaults might not utilize the full
>> capabilities supported by the controller hardware. This can result in
>> suboptimal data transfer efficiency across the PCIe hierarchy.
>>
>> During host controller probing phase, when PCIe bus tuning is enabled,
>> the implementation now configures root port MPS settings to their
>> hardware-supported maximum values. By iterating through bridge devices
>> under the root bus and identifying PCIe root ports, each port's MPS is set
>> to 128 << pcie_mpss to match the device's maximum supported payload size.
>> The Max Read Request Size (MRRS) is subsequently adjusted through existing
>> companion logic to maintain compatibility with PCIe specifications.
>>
>> Explicit initialization at host probing stage ensures consistent PCIe
>> topology configuration before downstream devices perform their own MPS
>> negotiations. This proactive approach addresses platform-specific
>> requirements where controller drivers depend on properly initialized root
>> port settings, while maintaining backward compatibility through
>> PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF conditional checks. Hardware capabilities are fully
>> utilized without altering existing device negotiation behaviors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
>
> Perhaps Mani deserves a Suggested-by tag?
>
Dear Niklas,
Thank you very much for your reply. Ok. Sorry, I missed it. I 'm going
to add Suggested-by tag.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index 364fa2a514f8..3973c593fdcf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -3206,6 +3206,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_create_root_bus);
>> int pci_host_probe(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>> {
>> struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
>> + struct pci_dev *dev;
>> int ret;
>>
>> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
>> @@ -3228,6 +3229,17 @@ int pci_host_probe(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>> */
>> pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus);
>>
>> + if (pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF) {
>> + /* Configure root ports MPS to be MPSS by default */
>> + for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus) {
>> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + pcie_write_mps(dev, 128 << dev->pcie_mpss);
>> + pcie_write_mrrs(dev);
>
> The comment says configure MPS, but the code also calls pcie_write_mrrs().
>
> Should we update the comment or should we remove the call to pcie_write_mrrs()?
>
I have tested and found that the result is the same whether
pcie_write_mrrs() is called or not.
> Note that even when calling pcie_write_mrrs(), it will not update MRRS for the
> common case (pcie_bus_config == PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT).
But I discovered a problem:
0001:90:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
......
Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0
ExtTag- RBE+
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
MaxPayload 512 bytes, MaxReadReq 1024 bytes
Should the DevCtl MaxPayload be 256B?
But I tested that the file reading and writing were normal. Is the
display of 512B here what we expected?
Root Port 0003:30:00.0 has the same problem. May I ask what your opinion is?
......
0001:91:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller PM9A1/PM9A3/980PRO (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
......
Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
unlimited, L1 unlimited
ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
SlotPowerLimit 0W
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag+ PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
FLReset-
MaxPayload 256 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
......
Several PCIe ports that I enabled.
root@cix-localhost:~# cat /proc/version
Linux version 6.15.0-rc2-00015-gced1536aaf04-dirty (hans@hans) ......
root@cix-localhost:~# lspci
0000:c0:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001
0000:c1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller S4LV008[Pascal]
0001:90:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001
0001:91:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller PM9A1/PM9A3/980PRO
0003:30:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001
0003:31:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)root@cix-localhost:~# lspci -vvv
0000:c0:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
......
Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0
ExtTag+ RBE+
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag+ PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
MaxPayload 512 bytes, MaxReadReq 1024 bytes
......
0000:c1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller S4LV008[Pascal] (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
......
Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
unlimited, L1 unlimited
ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
SlotPowerLimit 0W
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag+ PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
FLReset-
MaxPayload 512 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
......
0001:90:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
......
Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0
ExtTag- RBE+
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
MaxPayload 512 bytes, MaxReadReq 1024 bytes
......
0001:91:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller PM9A1/PM9A3/980PRO (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
......
Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
unlimited, L1 unlimited
ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
SlotPowerLimit 0W
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag+ PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
FLReset-
MaxPayload 256 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
......
0003:30:00.0 PCI bridge: Device 1f6c:0001 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
......
Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0
ExtTag- RBE+
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
MaxPayload 512 bytes, MaxReadReq 1024 bytes
......
0003:31:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
......
Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
<512ns, L1 <64us
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
SlotPowerLimit 0W
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
MaxPayload 256 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
......
Best regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 9:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Configure max payload size on pci_host_probe Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Configure root port MPS to hardware maximum during host probing Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 10:23 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-25 10:56 ` Hans Zhang [this message]
2025-04-25 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-25 14:17 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Remove redundant MPS configuration Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 10:17 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-25 10:26 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 11:59 ` neil.armstrong
2025-04-25 14:20 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 18:13 ` Pali Rohár
2025-04-26 15:02 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-26 15:06 ` Pali Rohár
2025-04-26 15:20 ` Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4963173-dd9a-4341-b7f9-5fdb9485233a@163.com \
--to=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=yue.wang@amlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®