RE: [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH 00/24] Complete EEVDF

["Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>]

On 2025.01.14 02:59 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:14:17PM -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:

>>> means that there were 19 occurrences of turbostat interval times
>>> between 1.016 and 1.016999 seconds.
>> 
>> OK, let me lower my threshold to 10ms and change the turbostat
>> invocation -- see if I can catch me some wabbits :-)
>
> I've had it run overnight and have not caught a single >10ms event :-(

O.K. thanks for trying.

For me, the probability of occurrence does vary:

After moving gettimeofday calls back to their original places
in the code I recompiled turbostat, and got:

Total: 9082 : Total >= 10 mSec: 24 ( 0.26 percent)

And 2 previous tests had significant differences
In probability of occurrence:

Total: 9071 : Total >= 10 mSec: 39 ( 0.43 percent)
Total: 9079 : Total >= 10 mSec: 128 ( 1.41 percent)

Whenever I try to obtain more information by eliminating
the --Summary directive in turbostat, I never get
a >= 10 mSec hit

I tried looking into the sleep lengths by themselves without
using turbostat, and never saw a 1 second requested sleep
be longer than requested by >= 1 mSec.

Regardless, the 2 patches seem to have solved the up to
6 seconds extra time between samples issue. The most
I have seen with all this testing as been 23 milliseconds.