* re: tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
@ 2020-10-07 13:08 Colin Ian King
2020-10-07 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin Ian King @ 2020-10-07 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Zanussi; +Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
Hi,
Static analysis with Coverity has detected a duplicated condition in an
if statement in the following commit in source
kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c
commit bd82631d7ccdc894af2738e47abcba2cb6e7dea9
Author: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Date: Sun Oct 4 17:14:06 2020 -0500
tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
Analysis is as follows:
493 for (i = 0; i < event->n_fields; i++) {
Same on both sides (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)
pointless_expression: The expression event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
event->fields[i]->is_dynamic does not accomplish anything because it
evaluates to either of its identical operands, event->fields[i]->is_dynamic.
Did you intend the operands to be different?
494 if (event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
495 event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
496 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
497 ", __get_str(%s)",
event->fields[i]->name);
498 else
499 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
500 ", REC->%s",
event->fields[i]->name);
501 }
Colin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
2020-10-07 13:08 tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events Colin Ian King
@ 2020-10-07 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-07 13:35 ` Colin Ian King
2020-10-07 14:27 ` Tom Zanussi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2020-10-07 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin Ian King; +Cc: Tom Zanussi, Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:38 +0100
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Static analysis with Coverity has detected a duplicated condition in an
> if statement in the following commit in source
> kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c
>
> commit bd82631d7ccdc894af2738e47abcba2cb6e7dea9
> Author: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
> Date: Sun Oct 4 17:14:06 2020 -0500
>
> tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
>
> Analysis is as follows:
>
> 493 for (i = 0; i < event->n_fields; i++) {
>
> Same on both sides (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)
> pointless_expression: The expression event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
> event->fields[i]->is_dynamic does not accomplish anything because it
> evaluates to either of its identical operands, event->fields[i]->is_dynamic.
>
> Did you intend the operands to be different?
>
> 494 if (event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
> 495 event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
Bah, I believe that was suppose to be:
if (event->fields[i]->is_string &&
event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
I'll go and fix that.
-- Steve
> 496 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
> 497 ", __get_str(%s)",
> event->fields[i]->name);
> 498 else
> 499 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
> 500 ", REC->%s",
> event->fields[i]->name);
> 501 }
>
> Colin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
2020-10-07 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2020-10-07 13:35 ` Colin Ian King
2020-10-07 14:27 ` Tom Zanussi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin Ian King @ 2020-10-07 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Tom Zanussi, Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
On 07/10/2020 14:30, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:38 +0100
> Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Static analysis with Coverity has detected a duplicated condition in an
>> if statement in the following commit in source
>> kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c
>>
>> commit bd82631d7ccdc894af2738e47abcba2cb6e7dea9
>> Author: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
>> Date: Sun Oct 4 17:14:06 2020 -0500
>>
>> tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
>>
>> Analysis is as follows:
>>
>> 493 for (i = 0; i < event->n_fields; i++) {
>>
>> Same on both sides (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)
>> pointless_expression: The expression event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
>> event->fields[i]->is_dynamic does not accomplish anything because it
>> evaluates to either of its identical operands, event->fields[i]->is_dynamic.
>>
>> Did you intend the operands to be different?
>>
>> 494 if (event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
>> 495 event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
>
> Bah, I believe that was suppose to be:
>
> if (event->fields[i]->is_string &&
> event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
>
> I'll go and fix that.
Ah, makes sense. Thanks!
>
> -- Steve
>
>> 496 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
>> 497 ", __get_str(%s)",
>> event->fields[i]->name);
>> 498 else
>> 499 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
>> 500 ", REC->%s",
>> event->fields[i]->name);
>> 501 }
>>
>> Colin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
2020-10-07 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-07 13:35 ` Colin Ian King
@ 2020-10-07 14:27 ` Tom Zanussi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Zanussi @ 2020-10-07 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Colin Ian King; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 09:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:38 +0100
> Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Static analysis with Coverity has detected a duplicated condition
> > in an
> > if statement in the following commit in source
> > kernel/trace/trace_events_synth.c
> >
> > commit bd82631d7ccdc894af2738e47abcba2cb6e7dea9
> > Author: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
> > Date: Sun Oct 4 17:14:06 2020 -0500
> >
> > tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events
> >
> > Analysis is as follows:
> >
> > 493 for (i = 0; i < event->n_fields; i++) {
> >
> > Same on both sides (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)
> > pointless_expression: The expression event->fields[i]->is_dynamic
> > &&
> > event->fields[i]->is_dynamic does not accomplish anything because
> > it
> > evaluates to either of its identical operands, event->fields[i]-
> > >is_dynamic.
> >
> > Did you intend the operands to be different?
> >
> > 494 if (event->fields[i]->is_dynamic &&
> > 495 event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
>
> Bah, I believe that was suppose to be:
>
> if (event->fields[i]->is_string &&
> event->fields[i]->is_dynamic)
>
> I'll go and fix that.
>
Yep, thanks for fixing that.
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Tom
> -- Steve
>
> > 496 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
> > 497 ", __get_str(%s)",
> > event->fields[i]->name);
> > 498 else
> > 499 pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
> > 500 ", REC->%s",
> > event->fields[i]->name);
> > 501 }
> >
> > Colin
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-07 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-07 13:08 tracing: Add support for dynamic strings to synthetic events Colin Ian King
2020-10-07 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-07 13:35 ` Colin Ian King
2020-10-07 14:27 ` Tom Zanussi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome