mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John Hawkes" <hawkes@sgi.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@zip.com.au>, <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: <davem@redhat.com>, <marcelo@connectiva.com.br>,
	<riel@connectiva.com.br>, "Andrea Arcangeli" <andrea@suse.de>,
	<torvalds@transmeta.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<hawkes@engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:52:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00ad01c146ab$9d4b6340$6501a8c0@pchawkes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010926103424.A8893@in.ibm.com> <3BB16834.4393EEA3@zip.com.au>

From: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@zip.com.au>
> > John Hawkes from SGI had published some AIM7 numbers that showed
> > pagecache_lock to be a bottleneck above 4 processors. At 32
processors,
> > half the CPU cycles were spent on waiting for pagecache_lock. The
> > thread is at -
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lse-tech&m=98459051027582&w=2
> >
>
> That's NUMA hardware.   The per-hashqueue locking change made
> a big improvement on that hardware.  But when it was used on
> Intel hardware it made no measurable difference at all.

More specifically, that was on SGI Origin2000 32p mips64 ccNUMA
hardware.  The pagecache_lock bottleneck is substantially less on SGI
Itanium ccNUMA hardware running those AIM7 workloads.  I'm seeing
moderately significant contention on the Big Kernel Lock, mostly from
sys_lseek() and ext2_get_block().

John Hawkes
hawkes@sgi.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-26 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-26  5:04 Dipankar Sarma
2001-09-26  5:31 ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-26  7:08   ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-09-26 16:52   ` John Hawkes [this message]
2001-09-26  6:57 ` David S. Miller
     [not found] <fa.cbgmt3v.192gc8r@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.cd0mtbv.1aigc0v@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <i1m66a5o1zc.fsf@verden.pvv.ntnu.no>
2001-09-27  1:34     ` Vojtech Pavlik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-25 17:49 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 18:40   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 20:40     ` Josh MacDonald
2001-09-25 19:25       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 20:15   ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 19:02     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 20:24     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-25 22:26       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-26 17:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-25 20:28     ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 21:05       ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-25 21:48       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 20:29     ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 21:00       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-25 22:03         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-25 21:55       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 22:16         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-25 22:28         ` David S. Miller
2001-09-26 16:40           ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 17:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 17:40               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 17:44                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 18:01                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-26 18:01                 ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 20:20                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-26 20:24                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-26 17:45               ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 17:50               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 17:59                 ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 18:07                   ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 18:09                   ` Padraig Brady
2001-09-26 18:22                     ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 18:24                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 18:40                     ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 19:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 19:04                     ` George Greer
2001-09-26 18:59                 ` George Greer
2001-09-26 17:43             ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-26 18:24               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-26 18:48               ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-26 18:58                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-26 23:26             ` David S. Miller
2001-09-27 12:10               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-27 15:38                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-27 17:44                   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-27 19:41               ` David S. Miller
2001-09-27 22:59                 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-25 22:01     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-25 22:03     ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 22:59       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-25 21:57   ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00ad01c146ab$9d4b6340$6501a8c0@pchawkes' \
    --to=hawkes@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hawkes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@connectiva.com.br \
    --cc=riel@connectiva.com.br \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®