mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: bcrl@redhat.com
Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, andrea@suse.de, torvalds@transmeta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:28:58 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010925.152858.00453513.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010925181643.D19494@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010925170055.B19494@redhat.com> <20010925.145547.90825509.davem@redhat.com> <20010925181643.D19494@redhat.com>

   From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
   Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:16:43 -0400

   > Please note that the problem is lock cachelines in dirty exclusive
   > state, not a "lock held for long time" issue.
   
   Ahh, that's a cpu bug -- one my athlons don't suffer from.
   
Your Athlons may handle exclusive cache line acquisition more
efficiently (due to memory subsystem performance) but it still
does cost something.

   True, and that is why I would like to see more of the research that 
   justifies these changes, as well as comparisons with alternate techniques 
   before any of these patches make it into the base tree.  Even before that, 
   we need to clean up the code first.
   
As an aside, I actually think the per-hashchain version of the
pagecache locking is cleaner conceptually.  The reason is that
it makes it more clear that we are locking the "identity of page X"
instead of "the page cache".

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

   

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-25 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-25 17:49 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 18:40   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 20:40     ` Josh MacDonald
2001-09-25 19:25       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 20:15   ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 19:02     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-25 20:24     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-25 22:26       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-26 17:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-25 20:28     ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 21:05       ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-25 21:48       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 20:29     ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 21:00       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-25 22:03         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-25 21:55       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 22:16         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-25 22:28         ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-09-26 16:40           ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 17:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 17:40               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 17:44                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 18:01                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-26 18:01                 ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 20:20                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-26 20:24                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-26 17:45               ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 17:50               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 17:59                 ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 18:07                   ` Alan Cox
2001-09-26 18:09                   ` Padraig Brady
2001-09-26 18:22                     ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 18:24                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-26 18:40                     ` Dave Jones
2001-09-26 19:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-27 12:22                         ` CPU frequency shifting "problems" Padraig Brady
2001-09-27 12:44                           ` Dave Jones
2001-09-27 23:23                           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-28  0:55                             ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28  2:12                               ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-28  8:55                             ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-28 16:11                               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-28 20:29                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-28 22:24                                   ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-26 19:04                     ` Locking comment on shrink_caches() George Greer
2001-09-26 18:59                 ` George Greer
2001-09-26 17:43             ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-26 18:24               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-26 18:48               ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-26 18:58                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-26 23:26             ` David S. Miller
2001-09-27 12:10               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-27 15:38                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-27 17:44                   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-27 19:41               ` David S. Miller
2001-09-27 22:59                 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-25 22:01     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-25 22:03     ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25 22:59       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-25 21:57   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-26  5:04 Dipankar Sarma
2001-09-26  5:31 ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-26  7:08   ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-09-26 16:52   ` John Hawkes
2001-09-26  6:57 ` David S. Miller
     [not found] <fa.cbgmt3v.192gc8r@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.cd0mtbv.1aigc0v@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <i1m66a5o1zc.fsf@verden.pvv.ntnu.no>
2001-09-27  1:34     ` Vojtech Pavlik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010925.152858.00453513.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®