* [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt [not found] <CGME20220801031300epcas2p25866dfc0158ecdd33ef18c44aa23b155@epcas2p2.samsung.com> @ 2022-08-01 3:09 ` Kiwoong Kim 2022-08-01 17:21 ` Bart Van Assche 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Kiwoong Kim @ 2022-08-01 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, alim.akhtar, avri.altman, jejb, martin.petersen, beanhuo, adrian.hunter, sc.suh, hy50.seo, sh425.lee, bhoon95.kim Cc: Kiwoong Kim Link lost is treated as fatal error with the following patch, but its event isn't registered as interrupt source, so I enable it. -- scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h index a7ff0e5..0b627f4 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h @@ -133,11 +133,7 @@ static inline u32 ufshci_version(u32 major, u32 minor) #define UFSHCD_UIC_MASK (UIC_COMMAND_COMPL | UFSHCD_UIC_PWR_MASK) -#define UFSHCD_ERROR_MASK (UIC_ERROR |\ - DEVICE_FATAL_ERROR |\ - CONTROLLER_FATAL_ERROR |\ - SYSTEM_BUS_FATAL_ERROR |\ - CRYPTO_ENGINE_FATAL_ERROR) +#define UFSHCD_ERROR_MASK (UIC_ERROR | INT_FATAL_ERRORS) #define INT_FATAL_ERRORS (DEVICE_FATAL_ERROR |\ CONTROLLER_FATAL_ERROR |\ -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt 2022-08-01 3:09 ` [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt Kiwoong Kim @ 2022-08-01 17:21 ` Bart Van Assche 2022-08-02 1:38 ` Kiwoong Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Bart Van Assche @ 2022-08-01 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kiwoong Kim, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, alim.akhtar, avri.altman, jejb, martin.petersen, beanhuo, adrian.hunter, sc.suh, hy50.seo, sh425.lee, bhoon95.kim On 7/31/22 20:09, Kiwoong Kim wrote: > Link lost is treated as fatal error with the following > patch, but its event isn't registered as interrupt source, > so I enable it. > -- > scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error Is this patch perhaps intended as a fix for patch "scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error"? If so, does it need a Fixes: tag? Thanks, Bart. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt 2022-08-01 17:21 ` Bart Van Assche @ 2022-08-02 1:38 ` Kiwoong Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Kiwoong Kim @ 2022-08-02 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Bart Van Assche', linux-scsi, linux-kernel, alim.akhtar, avri.altman, jejb, martin.petersen, beanhuo, adrian.hunter, sc.suh, hy50.seo, sh425.lee, bhoon95.kim > > Link lost is treated as fatal error with the following patch, but its > > event isn't registered as interrupt source, so I enable it. > > -- > > scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error > > Is this patch perhaps intended as a fix for patch "scsi: ufs: Treat link > loss as fatal error"? If so, does it need a Fixes: tag? > > Thanks, > > Bart. Right and let me add the tag. Thanks. Kiwoong Kim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-02 1:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20220801031300epcas2p25866dfc0158ecdd33ef18c44aa23b155@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2022-08-01 3:09 ` [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt Kiwoong Kim
2022-08-01 17:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-02 1:38 ` Kiwoong Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome