From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() and rename it.
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:30:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <017ca787f3a167302281b65e60d301d9f1c0f5de.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206054504.2950516-4-neilb@suse.de>
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 16:42 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> lookup_one_qstr_excl() is used for lookups prior to directory
> modifications, whether create, unlink, rename, or whatever.
>
> To prepare for allowing modification to happen in parallel, change
> lookup_one_qstr_excl() to use d_alloc_parallel().
>
> To reflect this, name is changed to lookup_one_qtr() - as the directory
> may be locked shared.
>
> If any for the "intent" LOOKUP flags are passed, the caller must ensure
> d_lookup_done() is called at an appropriate time. If none are passed
> then we can be sure ->lookup() will do a real lookup and d_lookup_done()
> is called internally.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> fs/smb/server/vfs.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/namei.h | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 5cdbd2eb4056..d684102d873d 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -1665,15 +1665,13 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_dcache(const struct qstr *name,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Parent directory has inode locked exclusive. This is one
> - * and only case when ->lookup() gets called on non in-lookup
> - * dentries - as the matter of fact, this only gets called
> - * when directory is guaranteed to have no in-lookup children
> - * at all.
> + * Parent directory has inode locked: exclusive or shared.
> + * If @flags contains any LOOKUP_INTENT_FLAGS then d_lookup_done()
> + * must be called after the intended operation is performed - or aborted.
> */
> -struct dentry *lookup_one_qstr_excl(const struct qstr *name,
> - struct dentry *base,
> - unsigned int flags)
> +struct dentry *lookup_one_qstr(const struct qstr *name,
> + struct dentry *base,
> + unsigned int flags)
> {
> struct dentry *dentry = lookup_dcache(name, base, flags);
> struct dentry *old;
> @@ -1686,18 +1684,25 @@ struct dentry *lookup_one_qstr_excl(const struct qstr *name,
> if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(dir)))
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>
> - dentry = d_alloc(base, name);
> - if (unlikely(!dentry))
> + dentry = d_alloc_parallel(base, name);
> + if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry)))
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + if (!d_in_lookup(dentry))
> + /* Raced with another thread which did the lookup */
> + return dentry;
>
> old = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, flags);
> if (unlikely(old)) {
> + d_lookup_done(dentry);
> dput(dentry);
> dentry = old;
> }
> + if ((flags & LOOKUP_INTENT_FLAGS) == 0)
> + /* ->lookup must have given final answer */
> + d_lookup_done(dentry);
This is kind of an ugly thing for the callers to get right. I think it
would be cleaner to just push the d_lookup_done() into all of the
callers that don't pass any intent flags, and do away with this.
> return dentry;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_one_qstr_excl);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_one_qstr);
>
> /**
> * lookup_fast - do fast lockless (but racy) lookup of a dentry
> @@ -2739,7 +2744,7 @@ static struct dentry *__kern_path_locked(int dfd, struct filename *name, struct
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> inode_lock_nested(path->dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> - d = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&last, path->dentry, 0);
> + d = lookup_one_qstr(&last, path->dentry, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(d)) {
> inode_unlock(path->dentry->d_inode);
> path_put(path);
> @@ -4078,8 +4083,8 @@ static struct dentry *filename_create(int dfd, struct filename *name,
> if (last.name[last.len] && !want_dir)
> create_flags = 0;
> inode_lock_nested(path->dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> - dentry = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&last, path->dentry,
> - reval_flag | create_flags);
> + dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&last, path->dentry,
> + reval_flag | create_flags);
> if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> goto unlock;
>
> @@ -4103,6 +4108,7 @@ static struct dentry *filename_create(int dfd, struct filename *name,
> }
> return dentry;
> fail:
> + d_lookup_done(dentry);
> dput(dentry);
> dentry = ERR_PTR(error);
> unlock:
> @@ -4508,7 +4514,7 @@ int do_rmdir(int dfd, struct filename *name)
> goto exit2;
>
> inode_lock_nested(path.dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> - dentry = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
> + dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
> error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
> if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> goto exit3;
> @@ -4641,7 +4647,7 @@ int do_unlinkat(int dfd, struct filename *name)
> goto exit2;
> retry_deleg:
> inode_lock_nested(path.dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> - dentry = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
> + dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
> error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
> if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
>
> @@ -5231,8 +5237,8 @@ int do_renameat2(int olddfd, struct filename *from, int newdfd,
> goto exit_lock_rename;
> }
>
> - old_dentry = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&old_last, old_path.dentry,
> - lookup_flags);
> + old_dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&old_last, old_path.dentry,
> + lookup_flags);
> error = PTR_ERR(old_dentry);
> if (IS_ERR(old_dentry))
> goto exit3;
> @@ -5240,8 +5246,8 @@ int do_renameat2(int olddfd, struct filename *from, int newdfd,
> error = -ENOENT;
> if (d_is_negative(old_dentry))
> goto exit4;
> - new_dentry = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&new_last, new_path.dentry,
> - lookup_flags | target_flags);
> + new_dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&new_last, new_path.dentry,
> + lookup_flags | target_flags);
> error = PTR_ERR(new_dentry);
> if (IS_ERR(new_dentry))
> goto exit4;
> @@ -5292,6 +5298,7 @@ int do_renameat2(int olddfd, struct filename *from, int newdfd,
> rd.flags = flags;
> error = vfs_rename(&rd);
> exit5:
> + d_lookup_done(new_dentry);
> dput(new_dentry);
> exit4:
> dput(old_dentry);
> diff --git a/fs/smb/server/vfs.c b/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
> index 4e580bb7baf8..89b3823f6405 100644
> --- a/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int ksmbd_vfs_path_lookup_locked(struct ksmbd_share_config *share_conf,
> }
>
> inode_lock_nested(parent_path->dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> - d = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&last, parent_path->dentry, 0);
> + d = lookup_one_qstr(&last, parent_path->dentry, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(d))
> goto err_out;
>
> @@ -726,8 +726,8 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_rename(struct ksmbd_work *work, const struct path *old_path,
> ksmbd_fd_put(work, parent_fp);
> }
>
> - new_dentry = lookup_one_qstr_excl(&new_last, new_path.dentry,
> - lookup_flags | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET);
> + new_dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&new_last, new_path.dentry,
> + lookup_flags | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET);
> if (IS_ERR(new_dentry)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(new_dentry);
> goto out3;
> @@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_rename(struct ksmbd_work *work, const struct path *old_path,
> ksmbd_debug(VFS, "vfs_rename failed err %d\n", err);
>
> out4:
> + d_lookup_done(new_dentry);
> dput(new_dentry);
> out3:
> dput(old_parent);
> diff --git a/include/linux/namei.h b/include/linux/namei.h
> index 8ec8fed3bce8..06bb3ea65beb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/namei.h
> +++ b/include/linux/namei.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ enum {LAST_NORM, LAST_ROOT, LAST_DOT, LAST_DOTDOT};
> #define LOOKUP_EXCL 0x0400 /* ... in exclusive creation */
> #define LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET 0x0800 /* ... in destination of rename() */
>
> +#define LOOKUP_INTENT_FLAGS (LOOKUP_OPEN | LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_EXCL | \
> + LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET)
> +
> /* internal use only */
> #define LOOKUP_PARENT 0x0010
>
> @@ -52,9 +55,9 @@ extern int path_pts(struct path *path);
>
> extern int user_path_at(int, const char __user *, unsigned, struct path *);
>
> -struct dentry *lookup_one_qstr_excl(const struct qstr *name,
> - struct dentry *base,
> - unsigned int flags);
> +struct dentry *lookup_one_qstr(const struct qstr *name,
> + struct dentry *base,
> + unsigned int flags);
> extern int kern_path(const char *, unsigned, struct path *);
>
> extern struct dentry *kern_path_create(int, const char *, struct path *, unsigned int);
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 5:42 [PATCH 00/19 v7?] RFC: Allow concurrent and async changes in a directory NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 01/19] VFS: introduce vfs_mkdir_return() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:24 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 23:52 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:52 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-06 23:57 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 19:45 ` Al Viro
2025-02-10 4:36 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 02/19] VFS: use global wait-queue table for d_alloc_parallel() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 19:32 ` Al Viro
2025-02-10 4:58 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-10 5:15 ` Al Viro
2025-02-11 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-12 0:25 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 1:46 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 03/19] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() and rename it NeilBrown
2025-02-06 14:30 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-02-07 0:04 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 0:23 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 20:01 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 04/19] VFS: change kern_path_locked() and user_path_locked_at() to never return negative dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:31 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 13:09 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 0:08 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 05/19] VFS: add common error checks to lookup_one_qstr() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:33 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 20:14 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 20:23 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 06/19] VFS: repack DENTRY_ flags NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:34 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 07/19] VFS: repack LOOKUP_ bit flags NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:44 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 0:24 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:54 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 08/19] VFS: introduce lookup_and_lock() and friends NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 1:28 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 20:22 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 23:18 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 5:22 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-12 15:51 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 20:11 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 09/19] VFS: add _async versions of the various directory modifying inode_operations NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:15 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 1:46 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 22:41 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 1:09 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 4:57 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 10/19] VFS: introduce inode flags to report locking needs for directory ops NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:22 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 2:01 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 11/19] VFS: Add ability to exclusively lock a dentry and use for create/remove operations NeilBrown
2025-02-08 1:38 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 6:40 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 12/19] VFS: enhance d_splice_alias to accommodate shared-lock updates NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 13/19] VFS: lock dentry for ->revalidate to avoid races with rename etc NeilBrown
2025-02-07 20:28 ` Al Viro
2025-02-07 20:35 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 1:30 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 1:35 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 21:22 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 14/19] VFS: Ensure no async updates happening in directory being removed NeilBrown
2025-02-06 14:06 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 2:17 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 21:06 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 22:06 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-08 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-08 23:25 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 15/19] VFS: Change lookup_and_lock() to use shared lock when possible NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 16/19] VFS: add lookup_and_lock_rename() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 21:21 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 17/19] nfsd: use lookup_and_lock_one() and lookup_and_lock_rename_one() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 18/19] nfs: change mkdir inode_operation to mkdir_async NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 19/19] nfs: switch to _async for all directory ops NeilBrown
2025-02-13 3:51 ` Al Viro
2025-02-13 4:09 ` Al Viro
2025-02-13 18:01 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 14:36 ` [PATCH 00/19 v7?] RFC: Allow concurrent and async changes in a directory Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 15:36 ` John Stoffel
2025-02-07 2:18 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-09 23:33 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=017ca787f3a167302281b65e60d301d9f1c0f5de.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®