From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/19] VFS: enhance d_splice_alias to accommodate shared-lock updates
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:42:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206054504.2950516-13-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206054504.2950516-1-neilb@suse.de>
d_splice_alias() - via __d_unalias() - currently assumes that taking a
shared lock on the parent directory locks against any change to the
parent/name of the dentry. This will no longer be the case with
shared-lock updates. We also need a DCACHE_PAR_UPDATE lock on the
dentry.
This patch adds a call to d_update_trylock() to get this lock -if
possible. This lock ensures that the test on ->d_parent and ->d_name in
d_update_lock() will not be invalidated by the __d_move() in __d_unalias.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/dcache.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index e705696ca57e..fb331596f1b1 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -3036,13 +3036,17 @@ static int __d_unalias(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *alias)
goto out_err;
m2 = &alias->d_parent->d_inode->i_rwsem;
out_unalias:
+ if (!d_update_trylock(dentry, NULL, NULL))
+ goto out_err;
if (alias->d_op && alias->d_op->d_unalias_trylock &&
!alias->d_op->d_unalias_trylock(alias))
- goto out_err;
+ goto out_err2;
__d_move(alias, dentry, false);
if (alias->d_op && alias->d_op->d_unalias_unlock)
alias->d_op->d_unalias_unlock(alias);
ret = 0;
+out_err2:
+ d_update_unlock(dentry);
out_err:
if (m2)
up_read(m2);
@@ -3073,6 +3077,10 @@ static int __d_unalias(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *alias)
* In that case, we know that the inode will be a regular file, and also this
* will only occur during atomic_open. So we need to check for the dentry
* being already hashed only in the final case.
+ *
+ * @dentry must have a valid ->d_parent and that directory must be
+ * locked (i_rwsem) either exclusively or shared. If shared then
+ * @dentry must have %DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP or %DCACHE_PAR_UPDATE set.
*/
struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
{
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 5:42 [PATCH 00/19 v7?] RFC: Allow concurrent and async changes in a directory NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 01/19] VFS: introduce vfs_mkdir_return() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:24 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 23:52 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:52 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-06 23:57 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 19:45 ` Al Viro
2025-02-10 4:36 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 02/19] VFS: use global wait-queue table for d_alloc_parallel() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 19:32 ` Al Viro
2025-02-10 4:58 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-10 5:15 ` Al Viro
2025-02-11 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-12 0:25 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 1:46 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 03/19] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() and rename it NeilBrown
2025-02-06 14:30 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 0:04 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 0:23 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 20:01 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 04/19] VFS: change kern_path_locked() and user_path_locked_at() to never return negative dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:31 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 13:09 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 0:08 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 05/19] VFS: add common error checks to lookup_one_qstr() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:33 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 20:14 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 20:23 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 06/19] VFS: repack DENTRY_ flags NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:34 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 07/19] VFS: repack LOOKUP_ bit flags NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:44 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 0:24 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:54 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 08/19] VFS: introduce lookup_and_lock() and friends NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 1:28 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 20:22 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 23:18 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 5:22 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-12 15:51 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 20:11 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 09/19] VFS: add _async versions of the various directory modifying inode_operations NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:15 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 1:46 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 22:41 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 1:09 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 4:57 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 10/19] VFS: introduce inode flags to report locking needs for directory ops NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:22 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 2:01 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 11/19] VFS: Add ability to exclusively lock a dentry and use for create/remove operations NeilBrown
2025-02-08 1:38 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 6:40 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 13/19] VFS: lock dentry for ->revalidate to avoid races with rename etc NeilBrown
2025-02-07 20:28 ` Al Viro
2025-02-07 20:35 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 1:30 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 1:35 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 21:22 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 14/19] VFS: Ensure no async updates happening in directory being removed NeilBrown
2025-02-06 14:06 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 2:17 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 21:06 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 22:06 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-08 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-08 23:25 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 15/19] VFS: Change lookup_and_lock() to use shared lock when possible NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 16/19] VFS: add lookup_and_lock_rename() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 21:21 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 17/19] nfsd: use lookup_and_lock_one() and lookup_and_lock_rename_one() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 18/19] nfs: change mkdir inode_operation to mkdir_async NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 19/19] nfs: switch to _async for all directory ops NeilBrown
2025-02-13 3:51 ` Al Viro
2025-02-13 4:09 ` Al Viro
2025-02-13 18:01 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 14:36 ` [PATCH 00/19 v7?] RFC: Allow concurrent and async changes in a directory Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 15:36 ` John Stoffel
2025-02-07 2:18 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-09 23:33 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206054504.2950516-13-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®