From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 16/19] VFS: add lookup_and_lock_rename()
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:42:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206054504.2950516-17-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206054504.2950516-1-neilb@suse.de>
lookup_and_lock_rename() combines locking and lookup for two names.
It uses the new lock_two_directories_shared() if that is appropriate for
the filesystem.
unlock_rename_shared() does either a shared unlock or an exclusive
unlock depending on how the filesystem wants rename to be handled.
lookup_and_lock_rename_one() and done_lookup_and_lock_rename() are
exported for other modules to use.
As a rename can continue asynchronously after the inode lock is dropped,
lock_two_directories() and lock_two_directories_shared() must ensure
that is not happening before looking at ->d_parent. This requires a
call to d_update_wait(). Note that is the dentry is locked for update
it must be a rename. It cannot be a create or a (successful) rmdir as
these dentries are not empty - except possibly the target directory, but
waiting for the rmdir there is still needed of course.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/namei.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/namei.h | 7 ++
2 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index c7b7445c770e..771e9d7b620c 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -3451,8 +3451,14 @@ static struct dentry *lock_two_directories(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
{
struct dentry *p = p1, *q = p2, *r;
- while ((r = p->d_parent) != p2 && r != p)
+ /* Ensure d_update_wait() tests are safe - one barrier for all */
+ smp_mb();
+
+ d_update_wait(p, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ while ((r = p->d_parent) != p2 && r != p) {
p = r;
+ d_update_wait(p, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ }
if (r == p2) {
// p is a child of p2 and an ancestor of p1 or p1 itself
inode_lock_nested(p2->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
@@ -3461,8 +3467,11 @@ static struct dentry *lock_two_directories(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
}
// p is the root of connected component that contains p1
// p2 does not occur on the path from p to p1
- while ((r = q->d_parent) != p1 && r != p && r != q)
+ d_update_wait(q, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ while ((r = q->d_parent) != p1 && r != p && r != q) {
q = r;
+ d_update_wait(q, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ }
if (r == p1) {
// q is a child of p1 and an ancestor of p2 or p2 itself
inode_lock_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
@@ -3479,6 +3488,46 @@ static struct dentry *lock_two_directories(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
}
}
+static struct dentry *lock_two_directories_shared(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
+{
+ struct dentry *p = p1, *q = p2, *r;
+
+ /* Ensure d_update_wait() tests are safe - one barrier for all */
+ smp_mb();
+
+ d_update_wait(p1, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ while ((r = p->d_parent) != p2 && r != p) {
+ p = r;
+ d_update_wait(p, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ }
+ if (r == p2) {
+ // p is a child of p2 and an ancestor of p1 or p1 itself
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p2->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
+ return p;
+ }
+ // p is the root of connected component that contains p1
+ // p2 does not occur on the path from p to p1
+ d_update_wait(q, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ while ((r = q->d_parent) != p1 && r != p && r != q) {
+ q = r;
+ d_update_wait(q, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
+ }
+ if (r == p1) {
+ // q is a child of p1 and an ancestor of p2 or p2 itself
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p2->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
+ return q;
+ } else if (likely(r == p)) {
+ // both p2 and p1 are descendents of p
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p2->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
+ return NULL;
+ } else { // no common ancestor at the time we'd been called
+ return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* p1 and p2 should be directories on the same fs.
*/
@@ -3494,6 +3543,134 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_rename);
+static void unlock_rename_shared(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
+{
+ if (!(p1->d_inode->i_flags & S_ASYNC_RENAME))
+ unlock_rename(p1, p2);
+ else {
+ inode_unlock_shared(p1->d_inode);
+ if (p1 != p2) {
+ inode_unlock_shared(p2->d_inode);
+ mutex_unlock(&p1->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static int
+lookup_and_lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2,
+ struct dentry **d1p, struct dentry **d2p,
+ struct qstr *last1, struct qstr *last2,
+ unsigned int flags1, unsigned int flags2)
+{
+ struct dentry *p = NULL;
+ struct dentry *d1, *d2;
+ bool ok1, ok2;
+
+ if (p1->d_inode->i_flags & S_ASYNC_RENAME) {
+ if (p1 == p2) {
+ /* same parent - only one parent lock needed and
+ * no s_vfs_rename_mutex */
+ inode_lock_shared_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&p1->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
+
+ p = lock_two_directories_shared(p1, p2);
+ if (IS_ERR(p)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&p1->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
+ return PTR_ERR(p);
+ }
+ }
+ } else
+ lock_rename(p1, p2);
+retry:
+ d1 = lookup_one_qstr(last1, p1, flags1);
+ if (IS_ERR(d1))
+ goto out_unlock_1;
+ d2 = lookup_one_qstr(last2, p2, flags2);
+ if (IS_ERR(d2))
+ goto out_unlock_2;
+
+ if (d1 == p) {
+ dput(d1); dput(d2);
+ unlock_rename_shared(p1, p2);
+ if (flags1 & LOOKUP_CREATE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ else
+ return -ENOTEMPTY;
+ }
+
+ if (d2 == p) {
+ dput(d1); dput(d2);
+ unlock_rename_shared(p1, p2);
+ if (flags2 & LOOKUP_CREATE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ else
+ return -ENOTEMPTY;
+ }
+
+ if (d1 < d2) {
+ ok1 = d_update_lock(d1, p1, last1, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ ok2 = d_update_lock(d2, p2, last2, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
+ } else if (d1 > d2) {
+ ok2 = d_update_lock(d2, p2, last2, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ ok1 = d_update_lock(d1, p1, last1, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
+ } else {
+ ok1 = ok2 = d_update_lock(d1, p1, last1, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ }
+ if (!ok1 || !ok2) {
+ if (ok1)
+ d_update_unlock(d1);
+ if (ok2 && d2 != d1)
+ d_update_unlock(d2);
+ dput(d1);
+ dput(d2);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ *d1p = d1; *d2p = d2;
+ return 0;
+
+out_unlock_2:
+ dput(d1);
+ d1 = d2;
+out_unlock_1:
+ unlock_rename_shared(p1, p2);
+ return PTR_ERR(d1);
+}
+
+int lookup_and_lock_rename_one(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2,
+ struct dentry **d1p, struct dentry **d2p,
+ const char *name1, int nlen1,
+ const char *name2, int nlen2,
+ unsigned int flags1, unsigned int flags2)
+{
+ struct qstr this1, this2;
+ int err;
+
+ err = lookup_one_common(&nop_mnt_idmap, name1, p1, nlen1, &this1);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ err = lookup_one_common(&nop_mnt_idmap, name2, p2, nlen2, &this2);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ return lookup_and_lock_rename(p1, p2, d1p, d2p, &this1, &this2,
+ flags1, flags2);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_and_lock_rename_one);
+
+void done_lookup_and_lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2,
+ struct dentry *d1, struct dentry *d2)
+{
+ d_lookup_done(d1);
+ d_lookup_done(d2);
+ d_update_unlock(d1);
+ if (d2 != d1)
+ d_update_unlock(d2);
+ unlock_rename_shared(p1, p2);
+ dput(d1);
+ dput(d2);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(done_lookup_and_lock_rename);
+
/*
* c1 and p2 should be on the same fs.
*/
@@ -5497,7 +5674,6 @@ int do_renameat2(int olddfd, struct filename *from, int newdfd,
{
struct renamedata rd;
struct dentry *old_dentry, *new_dentry;
- struct dentry *trap;
struct path old_path, new_path;
struct qstr old_last, new_last;
int old_type, new_type;
@@ -5548,51 +5724,33 @@ int do_renameat2(int olddfd, struct filename *from, int newdfd,
goto exit2;
retry_deleg:
- trap = lock_rename(new_path.dentry, old_path.dentry);
- if (IS_ERR(trap)) {
- error = PTR_ERR(trap);
+ error = lookup_and_lock_rename(old_path.dentry, new_path.dentry,
+ &old_dentry, &new_dentry,
+ &old_last, &new_last,
+ lookup_flags, lookup_flags | target_flags);
+ if (error)
goto exit_lock_rename;
- }
- old_dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&old_last, old_path.dentry,
- lookup_flags);
- error = PTR_ERR(old_dentry);
- if (IS_ERR(old_dentry))
- goto exit3;
- new_dentry = lookup_one_qstr(&new_last, new_path.dentry,
- lookup_flags | target_flags);
- error = PTR_ERR(new_dentry);
- if (IS_ERR(new_dentry))
- goto exit4;
if (flags & RENAME_EXCHANGE) {
if (!d_is_dir(new_dentry)) {
error = -ENOTDIR;
if (new_last.name[new_last.len])
- goto exit5;
+ goto exit_unlock;
}
}
/* unless the source is a directory trailing slashes give -ENOTDIR */
if (!d_is_dir(old_dentry)) {
error = -ENOTDIR;
if (old_last.name[old_last.len])
- goto exit5;
+ goto exit_unlock;
if (!(flags & RENAME_EXCHANGE) && new_last.name[new_last.len])
- goto exit5;
- }
- /* source should not be ancestor of target */
- error = -EINVAL;
- if (old_dentry == trap)
- goto exit5;
- /* target should not be an ancestor of source */
- if (!(flags & RENAME_EXCHANGE))
- error = -ENOTEMPTY;
- if (new_dentry == trap)
- goto exit5;
+ goto exit_unlock;
+ }
error = security_path_rename(&old_path, old_dentry,
&new_path, new_dentry, flags);
if (error)
- goto exit5;
+ goto exit_unlock;
rd.old_dir = old_path.dentry->d_inode;
rd.old_dentry = old_dentry;
@@ -5603,13 +5761,9 @@ int do_renameat2(int olddfd, struct filename *from, int newdfd,
rd.delegated_inode = &delegated_inode;
rd.flags = flags;
error = vfs_rename(&rd);
-exit5:
- d_lookup_done(new_dentry);
- dput(new_dentry);
-exit4:
- dput(old_dentry);
-exit3:
- unlock_rename(new_path.dentry, old_path.dentry);
+exit_unlock:
+ done_lookup_and_lock_rename(new_path.dentry, old_path.dentry,
+ new_dentry, old_dentry);
exit_lock_rename:
if (delegated_inode) {
error = break_deleg_wait(&delegated_inode);
diff --git a/include/linux/namei.h b/include/linux/namei.h
index 72e351640406..8ef7aa6ed64c 100644
--- a/include/linux/namei.h
+++ b/include/linux/namei.h
@@ -104,6 +104,13 @@ extern int follow_up(struct path *);
extern struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry *, struct dentry *);
extern struct dentry *lock_rename_child(struct dentry *, struct dentry *);
extern void unlock_rename(struct dentry *, struct dentry *);
+int lookup_and_lock_rename_one(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2,
+ struct dentry **d1p, struct dentry **d2p,
+ const char *name1, int nlen1,
+ const char *name2, int nlen2,
+ unsigned int flags1, unsigned int flags2);
+void done_lookup_and_lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2,
+ struct dentry *d1, struct dentry *d2);
/**
* mode_strip_umask - handle vfs umask stripping
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 5:42 [PATCH 00/19 v7?] RFC: Allow concurrent and async changes in a directory NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 01/19] VFS: introduce vfs_mkdir_return() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:24 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 23:52 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:52 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-06 23:57 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 19:45 ` Al Viro
2025-02-10 4:36 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 02/19] VFS: use global wait-queue table for d_alloc_parallel() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 19:32 ` Al Viro
2025-02-10 4:58 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-10 5:15 ` Al Viro
2025-02-11 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-12 0:25 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 1:46 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 03/19] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() and rename it NeilBrown
2025-02-06 14:30 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 0:04 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 0:23 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 20:01 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 04/19] VFS: change kern_path_locked() and user_path_locked_at() to never return negative dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:31 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 13:09 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 0:08 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 05/19] VFS: add common error checks to lookup_one_qstr() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:33 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 20:14 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 20:23 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 06/19] VFS: repack DENTRY_ flags NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:34 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 07/19] VFS: repack LOOKUP_ bit flags NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:44 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 0:24 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 12:54 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 08/19] VFS: introduce lookup_and_lock() and friends NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 1:28 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 20:22 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 23:18 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 5:22 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-12 15:51 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 20:11 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 09/19] VFS: add _async versions of the various directory modifying inode_operations NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:15 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 1:46 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 22:41 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 1:09 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 4:57 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 10/19] VFS: introduce inode flags to report locking needs for directory ops NeilBrown
2025-02-06 13:22 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 2:01 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 11/19] VFS: Add ability to exclusively lock a dentry and use for create/remove operations NeilBrown
2025-02-08 1:38 ` Al Viro
2025-02-09 6:40 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 12/19] VFS: enhance d_splice_alias to accommodate shared-lock updates NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 13/19] VFS: lock dentry for ->revalidate to avoid races with rename etc NeilBrown
2025-02-07 20:28 ` Al Viro
2025-02-07 20:35 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 1:30 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 1:35 ` Al Viro
2025-02-12 21:22 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 14/19] VFS: Ensure no async updates happening in directory being removed NeilBrown
2025-02-06 14:06 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-07 2:17 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-07 21:06 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 22:06 ` Al Viro
2025-02-08 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-08 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-08 23:25 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 15/19] VFS: Change lookup_and_lock() to use shared lock when possible NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2025-02-07 21:21 ` [PATCH 16/19] VFS: add lookup_and_lock_rename() Al Viro
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 17/19] nfsd: use lookup_and_lock_one() and lookup_and_lock_rename_one() NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 18/19] nfs: change mkdir inode_operation to mkdir_async NeilBrown
2025-02-06 5:42 ` [PATCH 19/19] nfs: switch to _async for all directory ops NeilBrown
2025-02-13 3:51 ` Al Viro
2025-02-13 4:09 ` Al Viro
2025-02-13 18:01 ` Al Viro
2025-02-06 14:36 ` [PATCH 00/19 v7?] RFC: Allow concurrent and async changes in a directory Christian Brauner
2025-02-06 15:36 ` John Stoffel
2025-02-07 2:18 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-09 23:33 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206054504.2950516-17-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®