From: johan.adolfsson@axis.com
To: <root@chaos.analogic.com>, "Jamie Lokier" <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Terje Eggestad" <terje.eggestad@scali.com>,
"Ben Greear" <greearb@candelatech.com>,
"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"george anzinger" <george@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() system call timing curiosity
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:06:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <025b01c1c6d4$63c05500$aab270d5@homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020308134552.6627A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
What happens if you remove the printf/puts and simply counts the number
of times the different cases happen?
Another thought: Isn't it quite common that clock generators has a mode
where the frequency differs around the desired frequency to spread the
spectrum
and easier pass EMC tests?
Could that be the case with the laptop?
/Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-08 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-06 3:41 a faster way to gettimeofday? Ben Greear
2002-03-06 3:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-06 4:20 ` Ben Greear
2002-03-06 4:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-06 4:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-07 14:14 ` a faster way to gettimeofday? rdtsc strangeness Terje Eggestad
2002-03-07 14:41 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-07 15:43 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-03-07 16:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-07 18:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-08 1:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-08 1:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-08 1:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-08 18:30 ` gettimeofday() system call timing curiosity Jamie Lokier
2002-03-08 18:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-08 20:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-08 20:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-08 18:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-08 19:06 ` johan.adolfsson [this message]
2002-03-08 19:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-08 19:45 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-08 20:29 ` johan.adolfsson
2002-03-08 20:43 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-09 3:03 ` pjd
2002-03-09 18:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-09 3:15 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-03-08 19:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 20:40 ` george anzinger
2002-03-06 20:45 ` a faster way to gettimeofday? dean gaudet
2002-03-06 21:31 ` Chris Ball
2002-03-06 22:25 ` george anzinger
2002-03-07 0:04 ` vsyscalls Mark Mielke
2002-03-06 16:16 ` a faster way to gettimeofday? Chris Friesen
2002-03-06 16:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-11 22:47 ` OBATA Noboru
2002-03-12 13:06 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-12 15:12 ` OBATA Noboru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='025b01c1c6d4$63c05500$aab270d5@homeip.net' \
--to=johan.adolfsson@axis.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=terje.eggestad@scali.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®