From: "Milan Roubal" <roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
To: "Samuel Flory" <sflory@rackable.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mru@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Promise SATA 150 TX2 plus
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:54:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039701c34675$81a8b0e0$401a71c3@izidor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F0C5D55.4030304@rackable.com>
Hi,
> Milan Roubal wrote:
>
> >So other question - is there SATA controler that
> >is working in linux multiple controlers (4 cards)
> >and is for better bus than standart PCI? Like PCI-X or
> >PCI 66 MHz like promise is?
> >
> >
>
> Most current SATA cards aren't faster than 64/66. Heck many are
> 32/66, or 64/33. The problem is most everyone other than 3ware's linux
> drivers suck. I can't find a non raid SATA controller than works for me
> under linux.
>
Heh, bad news for me.
> 3ware cards tend to max out a 64/33 solt around 6 drives for
> sequential IO. (This will change in their next gen cards) You get much
> better performance with two 8 port cards running 6 drives each than a
> single 12 port card. Personally I recommend either 3ware raid10, or
> linux software raid 5 if you're a performance junky.
>
> Adaptec does have a new 4 port card sata raid card. It seems to work
> well, and the driver on their cdrom includes around 30 precompiled
> binaries for various RH, MDK, and Suse kernels. Source for the updated
> aacraid driver is included. An interesting side note their cdrom seem
> to run linux. (Yes they seem to provide source/patches for the various
> gpl programs it uses.)
>
> --
> Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
> (The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
> Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
>
All this cards are RAID controllers, I want only SATA controlers and I am
using software raid 5.
I was using Promise TX2 controllers for PATA drives and it was working
great, so I tried
the SATA card from Promise too and it looks only troubles and troubles...
Milan Roubal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-09 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-09 13:16 Mitch
2003-07-09 13:34 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 14:11 ` mru
2003-07-09 14:51 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 17:58 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-07-10 0:06 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10 0:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10 0:37 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10 6:35 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-07-09 18:22 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-09 23:54 ` Milan Roubal [this message]
2003-07-10 0:15 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 0:30 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10 0:50 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 2:36 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 15:08 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-09 15:19 ` mru
2003-07-09 16:16 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-10 0:08 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 19:56 ` Marcel J.E. Mol
2003-07-09 23:48 ` Milan Roubal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-09 12:57 Milan Roubal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='039701c34675$81a8b0e0$401a71c3@izidor' \
--to=roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sflory@rackable.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®