From: "Milan Roubal" <roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Matthias Schniedermeyer" <ms@citd.de>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mru@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Promise SATA 150 TX2 plus
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 02:37:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03e601c3467b$659d1160$401a71c3@izidor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1057796402.7386.8.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
My board is PCI-X for all 6 slots or I can use
PCI 64/66 for all slots. I am looking for cards that
are not slow on this. I have got a working system
with Promise PATA controllers that can read
in software RAID 250 MB/s in sustained read
and more than 150 MB/s random read. I am looking
for same speeds with SATA drives and controllers.
Thanx for the answer
Milan Roubal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Milan Roubal" <roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: "Matthias Schniedermeyer" <ms@citd.de>; "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <mru@users.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: Promise SATA 150 TX2 plus
> On Iau, 2003-07-10 at 01:06, Milan Roubal wrote:
> > Wow, how is the performance of this cards? HPT PATA controllers
> > was always bad in performance and if it has got SATA to PATA converter,
> > I can't imagine how fast/slow it could be.
>
> If you are doing software raid its pretty irrelevant. With current
> drives the cost of the multiple PCI transfers for each copy of the block
> is the limiting factor on anything but PCI64/66Mhz really.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-10 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-09 13:16 Mitch
2003-07-09 13:34 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 14:11 ` mru
2003-07-09 14:51 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 17:58 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-07-10 0:06 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10 0:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10 0:37 ` Milan Roubal [this message]
2003-07-10 6:35 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-07-09 18:22 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-09 23:54 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10 0:15 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 0:30 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10 0:50 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 2:36 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 15:08 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-09 15:19 ` mru
2003-07-09 16:16 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-10 0:08 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 19:56 ` Marcel J.E. Mol
2003-07-09 23:48 ` Milan Roubal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-09 12:57 Milan Roubal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='03e601c3467b$659d1160$401a71c3@izidor' \
--to=roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ms@citd.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®