[PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Taniya Das]

Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
thus mark them as protected.

Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
---
Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.

This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
the LPASS reset.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
index 9209efcc49b57a853c4dd55ac52cd4dc98d7fe86..346b9a377e611cd3e32cf00d44e87b363bada07a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
@@ -759,3 +759,24 @@ &wifi {
 
 	status = "okay";
 };
+
+&gcc {
+	protected-clocks = <GCC_AGGRE_NOC_PCIE_1_AXI_CLK> ,<GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_PCIE_1_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_PCIE_1_MSTR_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_PHY_RCHNG_CLK_SRC>,
+			   <GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK_SRC>,
+			   <GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_Q2A_AXI_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK>, <GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK_SRC>,<GCC_USB30_SEC_MASTER_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MASTER_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_CLK_SRC>,
+			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_POSTDIV_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_USB30_SEC_SLEEP_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_AUX_CLK>, <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_AUX_CLK_SRC>,
+			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_COM_AUX_CLK>, <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_CFG_NOC_LPASS_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_MSS_GPLL0_MAIN_DIV_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_MSS_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_MSS_OFFLINE_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_MSS_Q6_MEMNOC_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_MSS_Q6SS_BOOT_CLK_SRC>,
+			   <GCC_SEC_CTRL_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_WPSS_AHB_CLK>,
+			   <GCC_WPSS_AHB_BDG_MST_CLK>, <GCC_WPSS_RSCP_CLK>;
+};

---
base-commit: 808eb958781e4ebb6e9c0962af2e856767e20f45
change-id: 20250206-protected_clock_qcm6490-4019e6a61d0b

Best regards,
-- 
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> thus mark them as protected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
> 
> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
> the LPASS reset.
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++

I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?

>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> index 9209efcc49b57a853c4dd55ac52cd4dc98d7fe86..346b9a377e611cd3e32cf00d44e87b363bada07a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> @@ -759,3 +759,24 @@ &wifi {
>  
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
> +
> +&gcc {

As you know, we sort nodes by address (if they have one), then
alphabetically. So this does not belong here.

Regards,
Bjorn

> +	protected-clocks = <GCC_AGGRE_NOC_PCIE_1_AXI_CLK> ,<GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_PCIE_1_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_MSTR_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_PHY_RCHNG_CLK_SRC>,
> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK_SRC>,
> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_Q2A_AXI_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK>, <GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK_SRC>,<GCC_USB30_SEC_MASTER_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MASTER_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_CLK_SRC>,
> +			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_POSTDIV_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_USB30_SEC_SLEEP_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_AUX_CLK>, <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_AUX_CLK_SRC>,
> +			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_COM_AUX_CLK>, <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_CFG_NOC_LPASS_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_MSS_GPLL0_MAIN_DIV_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_MSS_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_MSS_OFFLINE_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_MSS_Q6_MEMNOC_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_MSS_Q6SS_BOOT_CLK_SRC>,
> +			   <GCC_SEC_CTRL_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_WPSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +			   <GCC_WPSS_AHB_BDG_MST_CLK>, <GCC_WPSS_RSCP_CLK>;
> +};
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 808eb958781e4ebb6e9c0962af2e856767e20f45
> change-id: 20250206-protected_clock_qcm6490-4019e6a61d0b
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
> 

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Trilok Soni]

On 2/25/2025 8:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>> thus mark them as protected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>
>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>> the LPASS reset.
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?

Should we just delete these boards? I prefer to not have platforms which 
are not maintained.

-- 
---Trilok Soni

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 26.02.2025 6:01 AM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> On 2/25/2025 8:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>>> thus mark them as protected.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>>
>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>>> the LPASS reset.
>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
> 
> Should we just delete these boards? I prefer to not have platforms which 
> are not maintained.

I think there's enough RB3Gen2s in the wild now to get rid of this one..
Unless anyone has a real use for it, but it doesn't seem like that's the
case given the lack of activity

Konrad

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Taniya Das]

On 2/26/2025 11:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 26.02.2025 6:01 AM, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> On 2/25/2025 8:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>>>> thus mark them as protected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>>>> the LPASS reset.
>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
>>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
>>
>> Should we just delete these boards? I prefer to not have platforms which 
>> are not maintained.
> 
> I think there's enough RB3Gen2s in the wild now to get rid of this one..
> Unless anyone has a real use for it, but it doesn't seem like that's the
> case given the lack of activity
> 

At least there were requests for me to get this board boot up and that
is where this patch comes. I agree if they are not supported, should be
removed.

> Konrad

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Taniya Das]

On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>> thus mark them as protected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>
>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>> the LPASS reset.
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
> 

I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
due to these clocks.

>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>> index 9209efcc49b57a853c4dd55ac52cd4dc98d7fe86..346b9a377e611cd3e32cf00d44e87b363bada07a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>> @@ -759,3 +759,24 @@ &wifi {
>>  
>>  	status = "okay";
>>  };
>> +
>> +&gcc {
> 
> As you know, we sort nodes by address (if they have one), then
> alphabetically. So this does not belong here.
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
>> +	protected-clocks = <GCC_AGGRE_NOC_PCIE_1_AXI_CLK> ,<GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_PCIE_1_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_MSTR_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_PHY_RCHNG_CLK_SRC>,
>> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK_SRC>,
>> +			   <GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_Q2A_AXI_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK>, <GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK_SRC>,<GCC_USB30_SEC_MASTER_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MASTER_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_CLK_SRC>,
>> +			   <GCC_USB30_SEC_MOCK_UTMI_POSTDIV_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_USB30_SEC_SLEEP_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_AUX_CLK>, <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_AUX_CLK_SRC>,
>> +			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_COM_AUX_CLK>, <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_CFG_NOC_LPASS_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_MSS_GPLL0_MAIN_DIV_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_MSS_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_MSS_OFFLINE_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_MSS_Q6_MEMNOC_AXI_CLK>, <GCC_MSS_Q6SS_BOOT_CLK_SRC>,
>> +			   <GCC_SEC_CTRL_CLK_SRC>, <GCC_WPSS_AHB_CLK>,
>> +			   <GCC_WPSS_AHB_BDG_MST_CLK>, <GCC_WPSS_RSCP_CLK>;
>> +};
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 808eb958781e4ebb6e9c0962af2e856767e20f45
>> change-id: 20250206-protected_clock_qcm6490-4019e6a61d0b
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -- 
>> Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:42:39AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> >> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> >> thus mark them as protected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
> >>
> >> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
> >> the LPASS reset.
> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
> > that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
> > 
> 
> I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
> due to these clocks.

So, was the original submission in November 2023 broken or was it broken
by a later firmware upgrade which started to protect those clocks?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Taniya Das]

On 2/27/2025 9:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:42:39AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>>>> thus mark them as protected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>>>> the LPASS reset.
>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
>>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
>> due to these clocks.
> 
> So, was the original submission in November 2023 broken or was it broken
> by a later firmware upgrade which started to protect those clocks?
> 
That's a fair question, probably the later broke it.

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:56:27AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/27/2025 9:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:42:39AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> >>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> >>>> thus mark them as protected.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
> >>>> the LPASS reset.
> >>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>
> >>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
> >>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
> >> due to these clocks.
> > 
> > So, was the original submission in November 2023 broken or was it broken
> > by a later firmware upgrade which started to protect those clocks?
> > 
> That's a fair question, probably the later broke it.

Could you please document it this way? This would have removed possible
questions by Bjorn.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Taniya Das]

On 2/27/2025 10:02 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:56:27AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2025 9:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:42:39AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>>>>>> thus mark them as protected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>>>>>> the LPASS reset.
>>>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
>>>>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
>>>> due to these clocks.
>>>
>>> So, was the original submission in November 2023 broken or was it broken
>>> by a later firmware upgrade which started to protect those clocks?
>>>
>> That's a fair question, probably the later broke it.
> 
> Could you please document it this way? This would have removed possible
> questions by Bjorn.
> 
Sure, will take care and resubmit.

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:56:27AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/27/2025 9:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:42:39AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> >>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> >>>> thus mark them as protected.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
> >>>> the LPASS reset.
> >>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>
> >>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
> >>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
> >> due to these clocks.
> > 
> > So, was the original submission in November 2023 broken or was it broken
> > by a later firmware upgrade which started to protect those clocks?
> > 
> That's a fair question, probably the later broke it.

Given that the now introduced list of protected clocks exactly matches
the initial (incorrect) set for rb3gen2 I would be very surprised if
someone since then changed the IDP firmware to protect all those clocks.

More likely IDP was either not tested in a clean upstream build or
possibly only tested with no-ac firmware.

Regards,
Bjorn

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:43:21 +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> thus mark them as protected.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list
      commit: d40da533a701ef9e22f89e5ceee1ab48150daa30

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 09:55:57PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:43:21 +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> > thus mark them as protected.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks list
>       commit: d40da533a701ef9e22f89e5ceee1ab48150daa30

I thought that you wrote that the list of clocks is incorrect...

> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry