mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>,
	"Dennis, Jim" <jdennis@snapserver.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Congrats Marcelo,
Date: 26 Feb 2002 17:07:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1014764852.9994.191.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16f8Ey-0002qn-00@starship.berlin>
In-Reply-To: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B153AD4@cdserv.meridian-data.com> <20020226140644.U12832@lynx.adilger.int> <1014760581.5993.159.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>  <E16f8Ey-0002qn-00@starship.berlin>

On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 17:39, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> I'd really like to see XFS go in, but don't you think 2.5 is the place,
> with a view to 2.4 submission in due course?

This is my thinking, but the way 2.5 is diverging the argument that
xfs being stable in 2.5 prior to going into 2.4 probably will not mean
too much at the end of the day since the interfaces will probably
have diverged so much by then - and the interfaces are where the
nasties tend to come out. The core of XFS is pretty darn stable.

> 
> As far as making the case goes, do you have time to make a list of
> places where XFS goes outside fs/xfs, and why?

I have had about 20 emails since I got yours ;-) One of the reasons
I have not been attempting to submit XFS is that I have too many 
other things going on right now, hopefully things are getting 
quieter and I can take a shot at this again. I will see how tomorrow
goes ....

Steve

> 
> -- 
> Daniel
-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@sgi.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 20:38 Dennis, Jim
2002-02-26 20:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 21:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 21:15   ` crypto (was Re: Congrats Marcelo,) Jeff Garzik
2002-02-26 22:33     ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 21:15       ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 21:57         ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 22:29           ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 23:06             ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 21:35   ` Robert Love
2002-02-26 21:40     ` arjan
2002-02-26 21:47       ` Robert Love
2002-02-24 23:51         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-28 22:32           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01  9:50             ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-27  9:41     ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-26 21:56 ` Congrats Marcelo, Steve Lord
2002-02-24 23:39   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:23     ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-25  0:38       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:59     ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  0:47       ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-27  1:08         ` Matthew D. Pitts
2002-02-27  1:03       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-26 22:59   ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 22:59     ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:28       ` Whither XFS? (was: Congrats Marcelo) Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:39       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  8:22         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:00   ` Congrats Marcelo, J.A. Magallon
2002-02-26 23:07   ` Steve Lord [this message]
2002-02-25  0:10     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-28 21:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-03-01  0:01   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  0:37     ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:13       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:03         ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:51           ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:28     ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-01  1:53       ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02 22:35         ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-03-02  3:43   ` Stephen Degler
2002-02-28 22:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01  9:30 Andries.Brouwer
2002-03-01 18:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02  4:13 Dennis, Jim
2002-03-02 18:24 ` David Ford
2002-03-03 22:58 ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1014764852.9994.191.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com \
    --to=lord@sgi.com \
    --cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=jdennis@snapserver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®