From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
John stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [pm] fix time after suspend-to-*
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:33:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067329994.861.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310271535160.13116-100000@cherise>
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 00:43, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> Userspace behavior on suspend transitions is still a bit fuzzy at best. I
> am beginning to look at userspace requirements, so if anyone wants to send
> me suggestions, no matter how trivial or wacky, please feel free (on- or
> off-list).
Many userspace applications are not prepared for suspension, like
Evolution. When suspending the machine for a long time, all IMAP
sessions are broken as their counterpart TCP sockets timeout. While
resuming, Evolution is unable to handle this condition and simply
informs the network connection has been dropped.
What about sending the SIGPWR signal to all userspace processes before
suspending so applications like Evolution can be improved to handle this
signal, drop their IMAP connections and then, when resuming, reestablish
them?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-22 23:33 Pavel Machek
2003-10-22 23:52 ` john stultz
2003-10-23 8:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-23 20:23 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-23 20:55 ` john stultz
2003-10-23 23:09 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-23 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-24 0:29 ` john stultz
2003-10-24 0:39 ` john stultz
2003-10-24 2:10 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-24 7:48 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-27 23:24 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-27 23:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-10-28 1:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-10-28 8:33 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2003-10-28 9:32 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 11:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-10-28 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 12:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-10-28 22:23 ` Peter Chubb
2003-10-29 2:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-29 9:43 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 14:30 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-28 17:28 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 20:16 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-28 21:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-10-28 21:29 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-29 9:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-29 11:28 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-10-29 11:55 ` PCI Bus error 6290 or 0290 Remus
2003-10-29 12:40 ` Meelis Roos
2003-10-29 12:49 ` Remus
2003-10-29 20:42 ` [pm] fix time after suspend-to-* George Anzinger
2003-10-30 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 15:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-28 17:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 18:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-10-28 19:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-28 20:19 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-24 7:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-23 23:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-27 22:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-10-22 23:57 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-29 8:20 Mathias Fröhlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1067329994.861.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com \
--to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®