From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org, mochel@osdl.org, george@mvista.com,
johnstul@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [pm] fix time after suspend-to-*
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031028122907.GA1940@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031028224101.3220e0a6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi!
> > Not sure... We do not want applications to know. Certainly we can't
> > send a signal; SIGPWR already has some meaning and it would be bad to
> > override it.
>
> And SIGPWR is a bad choice anyway as the default action for SIGPWR
> is to terminate the process - I can't see people being amused if all
> their processes are killed when they suspend their laptop :-)
>
> We could invent a new signal whose default action is ignore ... Solaris
> has SIGFREEZE and SIGTHAW (the comment in the header file says used by CPR
> - whatever that is). SIGSUSPEND and SIGRESUME?
Is adding signal really that easy? I thought there's limited number of
them...
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-22 23:33 Pavel Machek
2003-10-22 23:52 ` john stultz
2003-10-23 8:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-23 20:23 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-23 20:55 ` john stultz
2003-10-23 23:09 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-23 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-24 0:29 ` john stultz
2003-10-24 0:39 ` john stultz
2003-10-24 2:10 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-24 7:48 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-27 23:24 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-27 23:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-10-28 1:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-10-28 8:33 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-28 9:32 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 11:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-10-28 12:29 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-10-28 12:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-10-28 22:23 ` Peter Chubb
2003-10-29 2:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-29 9:43 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 14:30 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-28 17:28 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 20:16 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-28 21:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-10-28 21:29 ` George Anzinger
2003-10-29 9:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-29 11:28 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-10-29 11:55 ` PCI Bus error 6290 or 0290 Remus
2003-10-29 12:40 ` Meelis Roos
2003-10-29 12:49 ` Remus
2003-10-29 20:42 ` [pm] fix time after suspend-to-* George Anzinger
2003-10-30 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 15:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-28 17:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-28 18:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-10-28 19:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-28 20:19 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-24 7:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-23 23:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-27 22:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-10-22 23:57 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-29 8:20 Mathias Fröhlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031028122907.GA1940@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome