* [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable
@ 2004-04-19 20:49 Fabian Frederick
2004-04-19 21:08 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Frederick @ 2004-04-19 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond; +Cc: lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 289 bytes --]
Trond,
Here is a patch to have nfs to sysctl although Maxreadahead is tunable
under nfs init only.Do you have an idea and do you think it's acceptable
to make it applicable directly i.e. would it be readahead reduction
tolerant ?
btw, is this inode.c an issue for V4 ?
Regards,
Fabian
[-- Attachment #2: nfsctl.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3711 bytes --]
diff -Naur orig/fs/nfs/inode.c edited/fs/nfs/inode.c
--- orig/fs/nfs/inode.c 2004-04-19 20:27:30.000000000 +0200
+++ edited/fs/nfs/inode.c 2004-04-19 22:32:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
* Change to nfs_read_super() to permit NFS mounts to multi-homed hosts.
* J.S.Peatfield@damtp.cam.ac.uk
*
+ * 04/04 (FabianF)
+ * -sysctl support
+ * -readahead through sysctl
+ *
*/
#include <linux/config.h>
@@ -42,13 +46,8 @@
#define NFSDBG_FACILITY NFSDBG_VFS
#define NFS_PARANOIA 1
-/* Maximum number of readahead requests
- * FIXME: this should really be a sysctl so that users may tune it to suit
- * their needs. People that do NFS over a slow network, might for
- * instance want to reduce it to something closer to 1 for improved
- * interactive response.
- */
-#define NFS_MAX_READAHEAD (RPC_DEF_SLOT_TABLE - 1)
+/*Local sysctl handling*/
+#include "sysctl.h"
static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *);
static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *, struct nfs_fattr *, unsigned long);
@@ -326,7 +325,7 @@
server->acdirmin = server->acdirmax = 0;
sb->s_flags |= MS_SYNCHRONOUS;
}
- server->backing_dev_info.ra_pages = server->rpages * NFS_MAX_READAHEAD;
+ server->backing_dev_info.ra_pages = server->rpages * nfs_maxreadahead;
sb->s_maxbytes = fsinfo.maxfilesize;
if (sb->s_maxbytes > MAX_LFS_FILESIZE)
@@ -1814,6 +1813,12 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
rpc_proc_register(&nfs_rpcstat);
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+ nfs_sysctl_table = register_sysctl_table(nfs_sysctl_root, 0);
+ if(!nfs_sysctl_table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+#endif
+
err = register_filesystem(&nfs_fs_type);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -1844,6 +1849,10 @@
#endif
unregister_filesystem(&nfs_fs_type);
unregister_nfs4fs();
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+ unregister_sysctl_table(nfs_sysctl_table);
+#endif
+
}
/* Not quite true; I just maintain it */
diff -Naur orig/fs/nfs/sysctl.h edited/fs/nfs/sysctl.h
--- orig/fs/nfs/sysctl.h 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ edited/fs/nfs/sysctl.h 2004-04-19 22:23:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * sysctl.h - NFS sysctl handling
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2004 Fabian Frederick (fabian.frederick@gmx.fr)
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_NFS_SYSCTL_H
+#define _LINUX_NFS_SYSCTL_H
+
+#include <linux/sysctl.h>
+static unsigned int nfs_maxreadahead = RPC_DEF_SLOT_TABLE-1;
+
+static const unsigned int nfs_maxreadahead_min = 0;
+static const unsigned int nfs_maxreadahead_max = 256;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static struct ctl_table_header *nfs_sysctl_table;
+
+#define CTL_UNNUMBERED -2
+
+static ctl_table nfs_sysctls[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
+ .procname = "nfs_maxreadahead",
+ .data = &nfs_maxreadahead,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_doulongvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = (unsigned long *) &nfs_maxreadahead_min,
+ .extra2 = (unsigned long *) &nfs_maxreadahead_max,
+ }
+};
+
+static ctl_table nfs_sysctl_dir[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
+ .procname = "nfs",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = nfs_sysctls,
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
+};
+
+static ctl_table nfs_sysctl_root[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_FS,
+ .procname = "fs",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = nfs_sysctl_dir,
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
+};
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
+#endif /* _LINUX_NFS_SYSCTL_H */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable
2004-04-19 20:49 [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable Fabian Frederick
@ 2004-04-19 21:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-19 21:29 ` Fabian Frederick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2004-04-19 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabian Frederick; +Cc: lkml
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 16:49, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> Trond,
>
> Here is a patch to have nfs to sysctl although Maxreadahead is tunable
> under nfs init only.Do you have an idea and do you think it's acceptable
> to make it applicable directly i.e. would it be readahead reduction
> tolerant ?
>
> btw, is this inode.c an issue for V4 ?
>
The lockd module has already registered the name /proc/sys/fs/nfs, so
your scheme will end up corrupting the sysctl list. Sorting out the
/proc namespace issue is the main reason why this hasn't been done
before.
Personally, I'd prefer renaming the lockd module into
/proc/sys/fs/lockd, but it will have to be up to Andrew to decide
whether he wants to allow that during a stable kernel cycle.
Also note that putting initializers into a ".h" file is horrible style.
".h" files should be for forward declarations only.
Cheers,
Trond
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable
2004-04-19 21:08 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2004-04-19 21:29 ` Fabian Frederick
2004-04-20 0:01 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Frederick @ 2004-04-19 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: lkml
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:08, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 16:49, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > Trond,
> >
> > Here is a patch to have nfs to sysctl although Maxreadahead is tunable
> > under nfs init only.Do you have an idea and do you think it's acceptable
> > to make it applicable directly i.e. would it be readahead reduction
> > tolerant ?
> >
> > btw, is this inode.c an issue for V4 ?
> >
>
> The lockd module has already registered the name /proc/sys/fs/nfs, so
> your scheme will end up corrupting the sysctl list. Sorting out the
> /proc namespace issue is the main reason why this hasn't been done
> before.
> Personally, I'd prefer renaming the lockd module into
> /proc/sys/fs/lockd, but it will have to be up to Andrew to decide
> whether he wants to allow that during a stable kernel cycle.
AFAICS one of the first sysctl concepts is to be redundancy tolerant.
If you take fs for instance, it's being declared here and there.
It means "if it doens't exist yet, we create it with mode (555) else
go cycle to the sub-branch (fs-nfs....) btw, we have a register(fs) so
no problem for me.Lockd has to do with nfs so it should be preserved at
the same place IMHO.
>
> Also note that putting initializers into a ".h" file is horrible style.
> ".h" files should be for forward declarations only.
I used both ntfs, coda fs scheme having in mind independant sysctl
registering in forthcoming releases.
But hey ! "I'm an absolute beginner" :) Maybe you and Andrew can tell me
what to do with this ugly patch ;) e.g. no sysctl.h -> include stuff in
inode.c ...
Regards,
FabianF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable
2004-04-19 21:29 ` Fabian Frederick
@ 2004-04-20 0:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-20 6:12 ` FabianF
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2004-04-20 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabian Frederick; +Cc: lkml
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 17:29, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> But hey ! "I'm an absolute beginner" :) Maybe you and Andrew can tell me
> what to do with this ugly patch ;) e.g. no sysctl.h -> include stuff in
> inode.c ...
Yes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable
2004-04-20 0:01 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2004-04-20 6:12 ` FabianF
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: FabianF @ 2004-04-20 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 391 bytes --]
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 02:01, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 17:29, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > But hey ! "I'm an absolute beginner" :) Maybe you and Andrew can tell me
> > what to do with this ugly patch ;) e.g. no sysctl.h -> include stuff in
> > inode.c ...
>
> Yes.
This 'superbeast in time' patch against same patchset:
-Type fixes
-All in inode.c
Regards,
Fabian
>
[-- Attachment #2: nfsctl2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3238 bytes --]
diff -Naur orig/fs/nfs/inode.c edited/fs/nfs/inode.c
--- orig/fs/nfs/inode.c 2004-04-19 20:27:30.000000000 +0200
+++ edited/fs/nfs/inode.c 2004-04-20 08:05:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
* Change to nfs_read_super() to permit NFS mounts to multi-homed hosts.
* J.S.Peatfield@damtp.cam.ac.uk
*
+ * April 2004 : Fabian Frederick
+ * -Add sysctl
+ * -maxreadahead to sysctl
+ *
*/
#include <linux/config.h>
@@ -42,13 +46,52 @@
#define NFSDBG_FACILITY NFSDBG_VFS
#define NFS_PARANOIA 1
-/* Maximum number of readahead requests
- * FIXME: this should really be a sysctl so that users may tune it to suit
- * their needs. People that do NFS over a slow network, might for
- * instance want to reduce it to something closer to 1 for improved
- * interactive response.
- */
-#define NFS_MAX_READAHEAD (RPC_DEF_SLOT_TABLE - 1)
+#include <linux/sysctl.h>
+
+static unsigned int nfs_maxreadahead = RPC_DEF_SLOT_TABLE-1;
+
+static const unsigned int nfs_maxreadahead_min = 0;
+static const unsigned int nfs_maxreadahead_max = 256;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static struct ctl_table_header *nfs_sysctl_table;
+
+#define CTL_UNNUMBERED -2
+
+static ctl_table nfs_sysctls[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
+ .procname = "nfs_maxreadahead",
+ .data = &nfs_maxreadahead,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = (unsigned int *) &nfs_maxreadahead_min,
+ .extra2 = (unsigned int *) &nfs_maxreadahead_max,
+ }
+};
+
+static ctl_table nfs_sysctl_dir[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
+ .procname = "nfs",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = nfs_sysctls,
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
+};
+
+static ctl_table nfs_sysctl_root[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_FS,
+ .procname = "fs",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = nfs_sysctl_dir,
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
+};
+
+#endif
static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *);
static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *, struct nfs_fattr *, unsigned long);
@@ -326,7 +369,7 @@
server->acdirmin = server->acdirmax = 0;
sb->s_flags |= MS_SYNCHRONOUS;
}
- server->backing_dev_info.ra_pages = server->rpages * NFS_MAX_READAHEAD;
+ server->backing_dev_info.ra_pages = server->rpages * nfs_maxreadahead;
sb->s_maxbytes = fsinfo.maxfilesize;
if (sb->s_maxbytes > MAX_LFS_FILESIZE)
@@ -1814,6 +1857,11 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
rpc_proc_register(&nfs_rpcstat);
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+ nfs_sysctl_table = register_sysctl_table(nfs_sysctl_root, 0);
+ if(!nfs_sysctl_table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+#endif
err = register_filesystem(&nfs_fs_type);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -1844,6 +1892,9 @@
#endif
unregister_filesystem(&nfs_fs_type);
unregister_nfs4fs();
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+ unregister_sysctl_table(nfs_sysctl_table);
+#endif
}
/* Not quite true; I just maintain it */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-20 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-19 20:49 [PATCH 2.6.6rc1-mm1] NFS sysctlized - readahead tunable Fabian Frederick
2004-04-19 21:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-19 21:29 ` Fabian Frederick
2004-04-20 0:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-20 6:12 ` FabianF
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®