Re: [PATCH] oom killer (Core)

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

Ooops, sorry it did add something to the Log after 10 minutes

On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 23:37 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> You're right. oom-kill() did not do anything wrong. See log below
> 
> This is w/o PREEMPT. Is it neccecary to verify w/ PREEMPT too ?
> 
> If it would have booted it still would have killed sshd instead of the
> application which was forking a lot of childs.
> 
> Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> 
> END OF LOG

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0000000c
 printing eip:
c011fe30
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
Modules linked in:
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<c011fe30>]    Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010082   (2.6.10-rc2)
EIP is at __queue_work+0x20/0x60
eax: 00000000   ebx: c032cc80   ecx: 00000000   edx: 00000008
esi: c03acd14   edi: 00000282   ebp: c035ff64   esp: c035ff34
ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=c035e000 task=c02ebb00)
Stack: c035ffa4 00000000 c03acd14 c035ff64 c011fe99 00000000 c032cc80
c01dd8b0
       c0119c20 00000000 00000000 c035ffa4 c035ff64 c035ff64 00000000
00000001
       c03a5868 0000000a 003d9007 c0115f3b c03a5868 00000046 00099100
c039e120
Call Trace:
 [<c011fe99>] queue_work+0x29/0x50
 [<c01dd8b0>] blank_screen_t+0x0/0x20
 [<c0119c20>] run_timer_softirq+0xb0/0x170
 [<c0115f3b>] __do_softirq+0x7b/0x90
 [<c0115f77>] do_softirq+0x27/0x30
 [<c010411e>] do_IRQ+0x1e/0x30
 [<c010271e>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
 [<c0100623>] default_idle+0x23/0x40
 [<c01006b4>] cpu_idle+0x34/0x40
 [<c03607d8>] start_kernel+0x168/0x1b0
 [<c0360370>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1e0
Code: eb e5 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 83 ec 10 8b 44 24 14 89 5c 24 04
8b 5c 2
 <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt