From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Voluspa <lista4@comhem.se>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom killer (Core)
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 22:02:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1102194124.13353.331.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1102185205.13353.309.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 19:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> I added some debug output and it calls __alloc_pages a couple of times.
> All those calls get out from the first goto got_pg as expected.
>
> I will try to add some more debug later
>
Your assumption that reverting the
- might_sleep_if(wait);
+ if (wait)
+ cond_resched();
change does solve the problem is correct. Looking at the diffs its the
only change which can have any influence at this point.
Mats. I don't understand why this did not work for you. The change has
to be reverted to the original line "might_sleep_if(wait)" !
Scheduling in this init stage causes the breakage.
might_sleep_if() is a nop and only does a state check when compiled with
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y, but it does neither sleep nor schedule.
It then works so far except that it kills the wrong process (sshd), but
I did expect that from the previous experience.
There is no multi kill or other strange things happening. I tested it
with hackbench and the real application _after_ adding my "whom to kill
patch" on top.
Looks much better now.
Can you agree to add the selection patch, which takes the multi child
forking process into account ? I don't explain again why it makes
sense :)
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-04 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-04 12:42 Voluspa
2004-12-04 16:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-04 18:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-04 21:02 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2004-12-05 0:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-05 14:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05 15:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-05 16:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-05 8:32 Voluspa
2004-12-05 2:22 Voluspa
2004-12-04 7:00 Voluspa
2004-12-04 8:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-01 10:21 tvrtko.ursulin
2004-12-01 9:49 tglx
2004-12-01 21:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-01 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-01 22:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02 3:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02 11:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 13:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 16:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02 16:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 11:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-12-02 17:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 17:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 18:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 19:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 19:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 20:11 ` Andre Tomt
2004-12-03 22:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 23:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-03 14:41 ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-03 21:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05 21:14 ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-02 23:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-03 2:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-03 22:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-03 22:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-03 23:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 16:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 17:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 18:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 18:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 18:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 19:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 16:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-03 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-03 22:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-05 2:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-05 13:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05 15:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 16:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 16:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-10 17:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 17:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-12 0:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-24 1:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1102194124.13353.331.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lista4@comhem.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®