From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Bernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:09:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108418990.12611.86.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050214220459.GM12235@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi.
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Andrew, if you get one big patch doing only type-safety (u32 ->
> > > > pm_message_t, no code changes), would you still take it this late? I
> > > > promise it is not going to break anything... It would help merge after
> > > > 2.6.11 quite a lot...
> > >
> > > Problem is, such a megapatch causes grief for all those people who maintain
> > > their own trees. It would be best, please, to split it into 10-20 bits and
> > > send the USB parts to Greg and the SCSI bits to James, etc.
> >
> > Okay; I can do that if everyone is happy with the thing as a whole.
> > Andrew, can I get your answer on Pavel's question - shall I just include
> > the u32->pm_message_t part?
>
> Yes, I believe it is too late to do anything than u32->pm_message_t
> conversion that changes no code...
I guess I'm wrong then - I thought the other changes avoided compilation
errors.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com
Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-14 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-14 5:43 Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-14 21:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 22:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 22:09 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2005-02-14 23:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 0:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 1:13 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-02-15 0:31 ` Fix pm_message_t in generic code [was Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes] Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 0:39 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in USB " Pavel Machek
2005-02-17 23:40 ` Greg KH
2005-02-28 1:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:41 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in OSS Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:46 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in PCMCIA Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:47 ` FIx u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in firewire Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 22:12 ` Jody McIntyre
2005-02-15 0:51 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in network device drivers Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:54 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in framebuffers Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:55 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in i8042.c Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 13:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-15 0:57 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in MMC Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:58 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in serials Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:00 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in macintosh Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:00 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in bttv Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:01 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in AGP Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 21:46 ` PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1108418990.12611.86.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au \
--to=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bernard@blackham.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®