From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Cc: Bernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:46:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050214214620.GG12235@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1108359808.12611.37.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au>
Hi!
> This patch is a conglomeration of about 5 patches that complete (I
> think!) the work of switching over to pm_message_t. Most of this work
> was done by Bernard Blackham, some by me, some by Pavel I think (I was
> out of action for part of the development). I believe it needs to go in
> before 2.6.11 in order to avoid compilation warnings and errors. The
> code has been in use by Suspend2 users for around three weeks. Please
> apply.
I have most of it in my tree already, modulo some usb stuff I done
wrong. Applied.
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-14 5:43 Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-14 21:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 22:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 22:09 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 23:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 0:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 1:13 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-02-15 0:31 ` Fix pm_message_t in generic code [was Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes] Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 0:39 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in USB " Pavel Machek
2005-02-17 23:40 ` Greg KH
2005-02-28 1:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:41 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in OSS Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:46 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in PCMCIA Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:47 ` FIx u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in firewire Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 22:12 ` Jody McIntyre
2005-02-15 0:51 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in network device drivers Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:54 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in framebuffers Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:55 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in i8042.c Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 13:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-15 0:57 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in MMC Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:58 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in serials Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:00 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in macintosh Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:00 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in bttv Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:01 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in AGP Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 21:46 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050214214620.GG12235@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=bernard@blackham.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®