From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, gerg@uclinux.org, jdike@karaya.com,
sammy@sammy.net, lethal@linux-sh.org, wli@holomorphy.com,
davem@davemloft.net, matthew@wil.cx, geert@linux-m68k.org,
paulus@samba.org, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com,
dev-etrax@axis.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, spyro@f2s.com,
Robert Wilkens <robw@optonline.net>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:25:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123943151.5296.117.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050813123956.GN22901@wotan.suse.de>
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> <rest snipped which also wasn't better>
Also, what you snipped was another issue, not addressed by the patch.
Some architectures test if the setting up of the signal handler stack
frame succeeded, and others don't. I believe that this may be a
problem, since it was recently fixed on the x86, and probably should be
addressed on the architectures that don't check for failure.
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-13 2:40 Steven Rostedt
2005-08-13 12:39 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-13 14:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-13 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-14 12:20 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-16 17:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-16 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-13 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123943151.5296.117.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev-etrax@axis.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=jdike@karaya.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=robw@optonline.net \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=sammy@sammy.net \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome