From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] More PCI patches for 2.6.13
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:47:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126421265.4171.249.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43237083.5070406@pobox.com>
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 19:47 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Presumably David Woodhouse (MTD maintainer) would yell if we just
> ripped out the in-tree users.
Not as much as I yelled when the inter_module_crap was added in the
first place. I'll be happy to see the back of it.
The code which uses it is in need of a redesign anyway, and I'd
previously said that I didn't want a patch which _only_ removes the
inter_module_crap; the warnings there were actually a real indication
that something more was needed. But at the Kernel Summit I was persuaded
otherwise -- I'd accept a minimal patch just to kill the warning.
> It is even more silly to continue compiling code that is dead for
> almost everybody.
Agreed. And even though it's deprecated, people don't _really_ stop
using it till it's dead.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-10 21:07 Alan Stern
2005-09-10 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 21:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 23:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-11 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-11 0:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-11 0:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 23:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-11 11:38 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-10 22:32 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-09-10 23:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-11 6:47 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2005-09-11 4:41 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 6:47 ` Alistair John Strachan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-11 2:34 Gabriel A. Devenyi
2005-09-09 22:07 Greg KH
2005-09-09 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09 22:54 ` Greg KH
2005-09-09 23:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 0:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 1:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 18:33 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-10 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-11 11:33 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-10 10:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126421265.4171.249.camel@baythorne.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®