From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, arjan@infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] More PCI patches for 2.6.13
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:33:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050911113356.GB2742@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509101152430.30958@g5.osdl.org>
Hi!
> > But, aren't these arguments for changing the functions to return void?
> > If there is never any point in checking the results, then why have
> > results at all?
>
> Trying to set other power states than D0 might return interesting values.
> Also, you _can_ use the value to determine whether the device supports PM
> states at all.
Perhaps we should make pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0) to succeed in
case of old device not supporting power managment? As you've said, it
is effectively in PCI_D0 anyway ;-).
Pavel
--
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 22:07 Greg KH
2005-09-09 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09 22:54 ` Greg KH
2005-09-09 23:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 0:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 1:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 18:33 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-10 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-11 11:33 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-09-10 10:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-09-10 21:07 Alan Stern
2005-09-10 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 21:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 23:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-11 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-11 0:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-11 0:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 23:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-11 11:38 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-10 22:32 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-09-10 23:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-11 6:47 ` David Woodhouse
2005-09-11 4:41 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 6:47 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-09-11 2:34 Gabriel A. Devenyi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050911113356.GB2742@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®