From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:58:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1135025932.4760.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512190948410.1678@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:49 -0800, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> Doesn't this corrupt caller saved registers?
Looks like it. I _really_ don't like calling functions from inline asm.
It's not nice. Can't we use atomic_dec_return() for this?
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-19 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-19 1:35 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 17:49 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-12-19 20:58 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2005-12-20 4:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 6:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 8:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 14:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 14:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 14:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 15:05 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 16:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 19:20 ` Russell King
2005-12-20 19:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-20 19:37 ` Russell King
2005-12-20 19:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 19:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 19:57 ` Russell King
2005-12-20 20:35 ` Horst von Brand
2005-12-20 19:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 19:34 ` Russell King
2005-12-20 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 21:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 22:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 22:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-21 6:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 2:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 19:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-20 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 4:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-21 6:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 4:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1135025932.4760.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®