From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement swap prefetching tweaks
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:27:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142141256.8021.18.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142139283.25358.68.camel@mindpipe>
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 23:54 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 08:51 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > There used to be a pages in flight 'restrictor plate' in there that
> > would have probably helped this situation at least a little. But in
> > any case, it sounds like you'll have to find a way to submit the IO in
> > itty bitty synchronous pieces.
>
> echo 64 > /sys/block/hd*/queue/max_sectors_kb
>
> There is basically a straight linear relation between whatever you set
> this to and the maximum scheduling latency you see. It was developed to
> solve the exact problem you are describing.
Ah, a very useful bit of information, thanks.
It won't help Con though, because he'll be dealing with every possible
configuration. I think he's going to have to either submit, wait,
bandwidth limiting sleep, repeat or something clever that does that.
Even with bandwidth restriction though, seek still bites mightily, so I
suspect he's stuck with little trickles of IO started when we'd
otherwise be idle. We'll see I suppose.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-12 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-10 9:54 Con Kolivas
2006-03-10 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10 23:11 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-11 4:18 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 4:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-11 4:34 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 5:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-11 5:04 ` [ck] " Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2006-03-11 5:21 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 5:46 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-11 3:50 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 5:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 5:50 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 5:58 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 6:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 7:20 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 7:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 8:16 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-11 8:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 7:24 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-11 7:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-11 8:15 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-12 4:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-12 5:27 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-03-12 8:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 6:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 6:50 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 7:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 8:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 8:05 ` [ck] " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142141256.8021.18.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome