mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	david@kernel.org, fvdl@google.com, linu.cherian@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, nikos.nikoleris@arm.com, osalvador@suse.de,
	rientjes@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com,
	will@kernel.org, yuzhao@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] hugetlb: Don't restore vmemmap of non-HVOed folios on bulk restore error
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:17:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11457D37-5AF9-46C2-95BC-CAD4B22741A1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021212738.321547-1-jthoughton@google.com>



> On Oct 22, 2026, at 05:27, James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 2:33 AM Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>>> On Oct 3, 2026, at 08:21, James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> index a1b51251103b..4dac7ed1df57 100644
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> @@ -1613,9 +1613,14 @@ static void bulk_vmemmap_restore_error(struct hstate *h,
>>>              * page is made a surplus page and removed from the list.
>>>              * If are able to restore vmemmap and free one hugetlb page, we
>>>              * quit processing the list to retry the bulk operation.
>>> +             *
>>> +             * Folios whose vmemmap was never optimized (e.g. because HVO
>>> +             * failed when they were allocated) can be freed right away;
>>> +             * remove_hugetlb_folio() has already cleared their hugetlb flag.
>> 
>> Since you mentioned the hugetlb flag is cleared. So it's unnecessary to clear it again.
>> 
>>>              */
>>>              list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, folio_list, lru)
>>> -                     if (hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio(h, folio)) {
>>> +                     if (folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio) &&
>>> +                         hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio(h, folio)) {
>>>                              list_del(&folio->lru);
>>>                              spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>>                              add_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, true);
>> 
>> Something like following:
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 6a011b627986..1ab3e61f4704 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -1616,21 +1616,31 @@ static void bulk_vmemmap_restore_error(struct hstate *h,
>>                 * If are able to restore vmemmap and free one hugetlb page, we
>>                 * quit processing the list to retry the bulk operation.
>>                 */
>> -               list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, folio_list, lru)
>> -                       if (hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio(h, folio)) {
>> -                               list_del(&folio->lru);
>> +               list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, folio_list, lru) {
>> +                       list_del(&folio->lru);
>> +
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * remove_hugetlb_folio() already cleared the hugetlb flag
>> +                        * for folios whose vmemmap was not optimized, so they can
>> +                        * be freed without restoring vmemmap.
>> +                        */
>> +                       if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio) &&
>> +                           hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio(h, folio)) {
>>                                spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>                                add_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, true);
>>                                spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>> -                       } else {
>> -                               list_del(&folio->lru);
>> +                               continue;
>> +                       }
>> +
>> +                       if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
>>                                spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>                                __folio_clear_hugetlb(folio);
>>                                spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>> -                               update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
>> -                               cond_resched();
>> -                               break;
>>                        }
>> +                       update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
>> +                       cond_resched();
>> +                       break;
>> +               }
>>        }
>> }
> 
> Thanks, Muchun. :) I think it's slightly easier to read without the second
> folio_test_hugetlb(), like this:

More clear, LGTM.

Thanks,
Muchun

> 
> 	list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, folio_list, lru) {
> 		list_del(&folio->lru);
> 		/*
> 		 * remove_hugetlb_folio() already cleared the hugetlb flag
> 		 * for folios whose vmemmap was not optimized, so they can
> 		 * be freed without restoring vmemmap.
> 		 */
> 		if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> 			if (hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio(h, folio)) {
> 				spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> 				add_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, true);
> 				spin_unlock_ire(&hugetlb_lock);
> 				continue;
> 			}
> 			spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> 			__folio_clear_hugetlb(folio);
> 			spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> 		}
> 		update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
> 		cond_resched();
> 		break;
> 	}
> 
> Applied this in the v3.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-03  0:21 [PATCH v2 00/20] Another attempt at HVO support on arm64 James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] hugetlb: Don't restore vmemmap of non-HVOed folios on bulk restore error James Houghton
2026-10-21  9:32   ` Muchun Song
2026-10-21 21:27     ` James Houghton
2026-10-22  2:17       ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64/pgtable: Clear AF with LDCLR on supported systems James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Always flush TLB if needed upon PTE remapping James Houghton
2026-10-21  9:54   ` Muchun Song
2026-10-21 21:59     ` James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Leave pages partially HVOed upon restore failure James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Use try_update_vmemmap_pte to update in-use PTEs James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Allow architectures to dynamically disallow HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Disable HVO sysctl if arch doesn't support HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] hugetlb: Fully initialize tail struct pages of non-pre-HVOed bootmem folios James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Allow architectures to make HVO enablement boot-time only James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Expose whether HVO is enabled to architecture code James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: Add bbm_through_af capability James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: Implement try_update_vmemmap_pte using the AF trick James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: Support hugetlb vmemmap optimization James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Add fault injection for in-place vmemmap PTE updates James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] selftests/mm: Add HugeTLB vmemmap optimization stress test James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] hugetlb_vmemmap: Use try_populate_vmemmap_pmd for replacing in-use PMDs James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] arm64: Implement try_populate_vmemmap_pmd using AF trick James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] arm64: Drop BBML3 requirement for HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] hugetlb_vmemmap: Add fault injection for in-place vmemmap PMD splits James Houghton
2026-10-03  0:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] selftests/mm: Add HVO pmd-split fault injection tests James Houghton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11457D37-5AF9-46C2-95BC-CAD4B22741A1@linux.dev \
    --to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=linu.cherian@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®