* [PATCH-rt] genirq error message clarification
@ 2006-06-10 21:43 Deepak Saxena
2006-06-10 21:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Deepak Saxena @ 2006-06-10 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
It makes it a bit easier to debug issues when we know what irq we're
having problems with.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Index: linux-2.6-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-rt.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ linux-2.6-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
mismatch:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
if (!(new->flags & SA_PROBEIRQ)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq handler mismatch\n", __FUNCTION__);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq %d handler mismatch\n", __FUNCTION__,
+ irq);
dump_stack();
}
return -EBUSY;
--
Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@plexity.net - http://www.plexity.net
In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask
"why were their poets silent?" - Bertold Brecht
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH-rt] genirq error message clarification
2006-06-10 21:43 [PATCH-rt] genirq error message clarification Deepak Saxena
@ 2006-06-10 21:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-06-10 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsaxena; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 14:43 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> It makes it a bit easier to debug issues when we know what irq we're
> having problems with.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-rt.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ linux-2.6-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
> mismatch:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> if (!(new->flags & SA_PROBEIRQ)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq handler mismatch\n", __FUNCTION__);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq %d handler mismatch\n", __FUNCTION__,
> + irq);
> dump_stack();
> }
> return -EBUSY;
Makes sense. Thanks, applied
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-10 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-10 21:43 [PATCH-rt] genirq error message clarification Deepak Saxena
2006-06-10 21:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®