From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 01/44] Consolidate flags for request_irq
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 15:09:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1151845747.25491.879.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060701174939.8b10f129.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 17:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:54:19 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Move the interrupt related SA_ flags out of linux/signal.h and rename
> > them to IRQF_ . This moves the interrupt related flags out of the signal
> > namespace and allows to remove the architecture dependencies.
> >
> > SA_INTERRUPT is not needed by userspace and glibc so it can be removed
> > safely. The existing SA_ constants are kept for easy transition and will
> > be removed after a 6 month grace period.
>
> You seem to have removed SA_PERCPU_IRQ without replacing it.
>
> drivers/char/mmtimer.c: In function `mmtimer_init':
> drivers/char/mmtimer.c:690: error: `IRQF_PERCPU' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/char/mmtimer.c:690: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> drivers/char/mmtimer.c:690: error: for each function it appears in.)
should go after
#define IRQF_TIMER 0x00000200
+defibe IRQF_PERCPU 0x00000400
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-02 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 14:54 [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 01/44] Consolidate flags for request_irq Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-02 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02 13:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 02/44] ALPHA: Use the new IRQF_ constansts Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 03/44] ARM26: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 04/44] ARM: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 05/44] CHRIS: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 06/44] FRV: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 07/44] H8300: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 08/44] I386: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 09/44] IA64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-03 11:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-03 11:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 10/44] M32R: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 11/44] M68KNOMMU: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 12/44] M68K: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 13/44] MIPS: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 14/44] PARISC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 15/44] POWERPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 16/44] PPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 17/44] S390: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 18/44] SH64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 19/44] SH: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 20/44] SPARC64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 21/44] SPARC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 22/44] UM: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 23/44] V850: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 24/44] x86_64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 25/44] XTENSA: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 26/44] generic irq: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 27/44] drivers/block " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 28/44] drivers/char: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 29/44] drivers/drm: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 30/44] ide: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 31/44] firewire: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 32/44] isdn: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 33/44] media: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 34/44] misc drivers: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 35/44] drivers/net: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 36/44] PARISC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 37/44] pci: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 38/44] rio: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 39/44] scsi: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 40/44] serial: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 41/44] usb: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 42/44] video: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 43/44] sound: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 44/44] Documentation: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 23:43 ` [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1151845747.25491.879.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®