From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 16:43:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060701164338.192c0acd.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060701145211.856500000@cruncher.tec.linutronix.de>
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:54:18 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The recent interrupt rework introduced bit value conflicts with sparc.
> Instead of introducing new architecture flags mess, move the interrupt
> SA_ flags out of the signal namespace and replace them by interrupt
> related flags.
>
> This allows to remove the obsolete SA_INTERRUPT flag and clean up
> the bit field values.
>
> The patch was mostly created by a script, manually fixed up and reviewed.
> Compile tested on various platforms. Boot tested on i386/x86_64
>
The amount of downstream wreckage from these changes is remarkably small -
I only had to diddle four or five patches and none of the git trees appear
to be affected. Right now, when the subsystems trees are maximally-merged
is the best time for this sort of thing.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-01 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 14:54 Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 01/44] Consolidate flags for request_irq Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-02 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02 13:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 02/44] ALPHA: Use the new IRQF_ constansts Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 03/44] ARM26: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 04/44] ARM: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 05/44] CHRIS: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 06/44] FRV: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 07/44] H8300: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 08/44] I386: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 09/44] IA64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-03 11:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-03 11:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 10/44] M32R: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 11/44] M68KNOMMU: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 12/44] M68K: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 13/44] MIPS: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 14/44] PARISC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 15/44] POWERPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 16/44] PPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 17/44] S390: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 18/44] SH64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 19/44] SH: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 20/44] SPARC64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 21/44] SPARC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 22/44] UM: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 23/44] V850: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 24/44] x86_64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 25/44] XTENSA: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 26/44] generic irq: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 27/44] drivers/block " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 28/44] drivers/char: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 29/44] drivers/drm: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 30/44] ide: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 31/44] firewire: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 32/44] isdn: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 33/44] media: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 34/44] misc drivers: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 35/44] drivers/net: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 36/44] PARISC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 37/44] pci: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 38/44] rio: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 39/44] scsi: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 40/44] serial: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 41/44] usb: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 42/44] video: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 43/44] sound: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 44/44] Documentation: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 23:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060701164338.192c0acd.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®