From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 09/44] IA64: Use the new IRQF_ constansts
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:56:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1151927792.24611.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq0r712hqd1.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net>
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 07:36 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>
> Thomas> Use the new IRQF_ constants and remove the SA_INTERRUPT define
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> You forgot to remove the duplicate define of IRQF_PERCPU from
> include/asm-ia64/irq.h when you introduced the one in
> include/linux/interrupt.h.
>
> On ia64, without this patch, building Linus' git tree spits out
> compile warnings left right and center (harmless ones though).
>
> I checked the ia64 code and I don't see any place that actually relied
> on the old define or hardcoded it in asm, but I could be wrong of
> course.
>
> It compiles, it boots, Enterprise Ready<tm>!
Andrew sent a fix to Linus already.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-03 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 14:54 [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 01/44] Consolidate flags for request_irq Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-02 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02 13:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 02/44] ALPHA: Use the new IRQF_ constansts Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 03/44] ARM26: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 04/44] ARM: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 05/44] CHRIS: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 06/44] FRV: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 07/44] H8300: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 08/44] I386: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 09/44] IA64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-03 11:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-03 11:56 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 10/44] M32R: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 11/44] M68KNOMMU: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 12/44] M68K: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 13/44] MIPS: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 14/44] PARISC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 15/44] POWERPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 16/44] PPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 17/44] S390: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 18/44] SH64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 19/44] SH: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 20/44] SPARC64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 21/44] SPARC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 22/44] UM: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 23/44] V850: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 24/44] x86_64: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 25/44] XTENSA: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 26/44] generic irq: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 27/44] drivers/block " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 28/44] drivers/char: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 29/44] drivers/drm: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 30/44] ide: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 31/44] firewire: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 32/44] isdn: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 33/44] media: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:54 ` [RFC][patch 34/44] misc drivers: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 35/44] drivers/net: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 36/44] PARISC: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 37/44] pci: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 38/44] rio: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 39/44] scsi: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 40/44] serial: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 41/44] usb: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 42/44] video: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 43/44] sound: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 14:55 ` [RFC][patch 44/44] Documentation: " Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-01 23:43 ` [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1151927792.24611.45.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®