* Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree
[not found] <200610070153.k971rw7S020875@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
@ 2006-10-08 9:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-10-08 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: dwalker, johnstul, mingo, zippel, LKML
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> Documents two new kernel parameters,
>
> timeofday_clocksource
> sched_clocksource
>
> Removed old ones,
>
> clocksource
> clock
NAK.
clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18.
1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod
2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again.
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree
2006-10-08 9:59 ` + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree Thomas Gleixner
@ 2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2006-10-08 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx; +Cc: akpm, johnstul, mingo, zippel, LKML
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > Documents two new kernel parameters,
> >
> > timeofday_clocksource
> > sched_clocksource
> >
> > Removed old ones,
> >
> > clocksource
> > clock
>
> NAK.
>
> clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18.
>
> 1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod
> 2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again.
True, I've been thinking about this.. I was think I could deprecate
"clocksource" and "clock" but keep them around like John originally had.
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree
2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker
@ 2006-10-08 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-10-08 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Walker; +Cc: akpm, johnstul, mingo, zippel, LKML
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 07:47 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > > Documents two new kernel parameters,
> > >
> > > timeofday_clocksource
> > > sched_clocksource
> > >
> > > Removed old ones,
> > >
> > > clocksource
> > > clock
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18.
> >
> > 1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod
> > 2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again.
>
> True, I've been thinking about this.. I was think I could deprecate
> "clocksource" and "clock" but keep them around like John originally had.
We really do not need another set of those. clocksource and
sched_clocksource is perfectly fine
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-08 15:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200610070153.k971rw7S020875@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-10-08 9:59 ` + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome