* Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree [not found] <200610070153.k971rw7S020875@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> @ 2006-10-08 9:59 ` Thomas Gleixner 2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-10-08 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akpm; +Cc: dwalker, johnstul, mingo, zippel, LKML On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > Documents two new kernel parameters, > > timeofday_clocksource > sched_clocksource > > Removed old ones, > > clocksource > clock NAK. clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18. 1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod 2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again. tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree 2006-10-08 9:59 ` + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker 2006-10-08 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Daniel Walker @ 2006-10-08 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tglx; +Cc: akpm, johnstul, mingo, zippel, LKML On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > > Documents two new kernel parameters, > > > > timeofday_clocksource > > sched_clocksource > > > > Removed old ones, > > > > clocksource > > clock > > NAK. > > clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18. > > 1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod > 2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again. True, I've been thinking about this.. I was think I could deprecate "clocksource" and "clock" but keep them around like John originally had. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree 2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker @ 2006-10-08 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-10-08 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Walker; +Cc: akpm, johnstul, mingo, zippel, LKML On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 07:47 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > > > Documents two new kernel parameters, > > > > > > timeofday_clocksource > > > sched_clocksource > > > > > > Removed old ones, > > > > > > clocksource > > > clock > > > > NAK. > > > > clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18. > > > > 1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod > > 2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again. > > True, I've been thinking about this.. I was think I could deprecate > "clocksource" and "clock" but keep them around like John originally had. We really do not need another set of those. clocksource and sched_clocksource is perfectly fine tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-08 15:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200610070153.k971rw7S020875@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-10-08 9:59 ` + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 14:47 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome